Riots in Tottenham, London! (NO RACIST COMMENTS)

Status
Not open for further replies.
The main problem is the government are giving tax payers money to people involved in doing the rioting as most of them are on benefits. The people rioting are taking the stuff they have looted back home then they think we need more money from the government so they will breed and have more and more SCUM kid's you can get up to 35K if you have 12 kid's while they watch the news on their new 50" TV.:mad::mad::mad:
 
Gerard said:
Wonder whos just been listening to Hugh Orde on the news.:eek:
Click to expand...

I don't know Hugh Orde is. Go and search this thread for my posts, I've been stating that the use of water cannon/plastic bullet/tear gas is wrong from the beginning. I haven't been stealing views from commentators.
I resent your comment.
 
"(no racist comments)" isn't that a universal?

What is racist exactly? If I were to point out that a dis-proportionate number of non-whites are involved in the troubles would I be breaking this rule?
 
Ahleckz said:
I don't know Hugh Orde is. Go and search this thread for my posts, I've been stating that the use of water cannon/plastic bullet/tear gas is wrong from the beginning. I haven't been stealing views from commentators.
I resent your comment.
Click to expand...

Resent all you want, he said pretty much exactly the same thing, that the water cannon wasn't that much use for fast moving mobs.
 
biuro74 said:
If you ask for technical details, I'd answer: it's not important as you've just lost big picture. Which is - all those brutal and violent tools are necessary AFTER/BECAUSE OF parenting fails.
Click to expand...

That may explain a few people, however that's not an excuse nor is it true in the bigger picture.
 
dirtydog said:
Yeah well other countries often don't understand what Britain is like nowadays, they have a quaint idea that we all speak like the Queen and sit around drinking cups of tea.
Click to expand...

But there's also the polar opposite stereotype that we're all football hooligans, who drink too much, have no manners and smash stuff up ;).
 
Disco Boy said:
"(no racist comments)" isn't that a universal?

What is racist exactly? If I were to point out that a dis-proportionate number of non-whites are involved in the troubles would I be breaking this rule?
Click to expand...

I am guessing its because of the gross amount of racism in this thread, some people needed a reminder.
 
Gerard said:
Resent all you want, he said pretty much exactly the same thing, that the water cannon wasn't that much use for fast moving mobs.
Click to expand...

He's a clever bloke then. I assumed you were suggesting I was just stealing my views from someone else and passing it off. Sorry if I misunderstood you.
 
gothic_hobbit said:
Someone will Photoshop a seagull drinking a cup of tea soon :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

teae.jpg
 
From deep within a haystack at the far end of a disused Plymouth pig farm, Dolph provides the harsh socio-political commentary this country so desperately needs! His only problem is a tendency to sound like Melanie Phillips channelling Ayn Rand at a séance led by Anne Coulter...

17.04.07
Dolph laments that police did not use powers available to them:

Dolph said:
The massacre was Thomas Hamilton's doing entirely, however, the police had evidence that should have been used to revoke his licence and wasn't. Hence why it wasn't a failure of the old laws, but of the police. If the police had used their powers that the old law had given them, Hamilton wouldn't have had legally held guns any more. Whether the massacre would still have taken place I couldn't say, but the kneejerk pointless ban probably wouldn't have happened...
Click to expand...

17.04.07
Dolph rages against Labour's "ever greater expansion of police power":

Dolph said:
The issue is not educational, but cultural, especially with Labour's ever greater expansion of police powers.
Click to expand...

06.03.10
Dolph fumes that Labour has "massively expanded police powers and reduced the rights of citizens" with "draconian legislation", in a "march towards a police state":

Dolph said:
Does that excuse Labour for passing the various acts that have massively expanded police powers and reduced the rights of citizens? Or is it just a red herring?

I have my doubts that the Tories will roll back all the draconian legislation passed by labour (not least because the public have been conditioned to think it is a good idea), but that doesn't change the basic fact that the march towards a police state increased dramatically under Labour.
Click to expand...

10.08.11
Dolph bemoans Labour's "emasculation of the police" (really? I thought they had "massively extended powers"?) while still insisting that "more and more behaviour was criminalised for normal people" (what behaviour?):

Dolph said:
Hopefully this will lead to a reversal of the emasculation of the police that has occurred over the last 13 years when it comes to dealing with scum (at the same time as more and more behaviour was criminalised for normal people). The police need to be free to act and to make appropriate choices to protect the public without constant fear of being harrassed by some quarters.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how it's possible to have "police state" controlled by an "emasculated" police force with "massively expanded police powers" (???) but apparently that's the situation. :confused:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom