The OcUK value and lepa PSU's are certainly not going to be more than 75% efficient, whereas the corsair one i mentioned will be a minimum of 81% efficient because of its 80+ bronze rating
+1 to this
The OcUK value and lepa PSU's are certainly not going to be more than 75% efficient, whereas the corsair one i mentioned will be a minimum of 81% efficient because of its 80+ bronze rating
has everyone forgotten that the corsair one i suggested is far more energy efficient than the OcUK value and lepa ones also suggested.
the money 'saved' by the crappy PSU's will have gone straight into the electric companies pocket after a year or so
the OcUK value and lepa PSU's are certainly not going to be more than 75% efficient, whereas the corsair one i mentioned will be a minimum of 81% efficient because of its 80+ bronze rating
Good point Reaper, didn't even think about efficiency. I got too caught up in describing different levels of polishing a turd.
I used a 700W which powered a Q6600 @ 3.2GHz with a heavily overclocked 9800GT and it barely broke a sweat. It's been in there for about 2 years now.
The 400W/500W mentioned that is in my mums PC has been fine for years.
A handful of other machines that have been cheap builds haven't blown up.
As the PC the OP has isn't particularly power hungry one of these PSUs should be adequate. That said I'm not bashing branded PSUs as of course you will get quality, I just believe that cheaper PSUs get a bad rap when they are great for low powered machines![]()
its still £7 more than needs to be spent. Id hardly trust the lepa to be more reliable than the ocuk one.
I wouldn't have a problem putting a lepa PSU in my system,But id never use a no brand![]()