I thought having different profiles on front/rear was standard practice on rear wheel drive cars with wider rears in comparison to the front.
[TW]Fox;19869759 said:It is but somewhat unusually the M3 on 19's has a 30 profile on both front and back - probably because the fronts are only 20mm narrower than the width.
On the assumption that BMW didn't choose this size 'for the lulz', I cannot see the point in deviating from the correct size on a £30k M3.
[TW]Fox;19869759 said:It is but somewhat unusually the M3 on 19's has a 30 profile on both front and back - probably because the fronts are only 20mm narrower than the width.
On the assumption that BMW didn't choose this size 'for the lulz', I cannot see the point in deviating from the correct size on a £30k M3.
Why skimp and save money on the only part of your car that keeps you attached to the road...?
Why skimp and save money on the only part of your car that keeps you attached to the road...?
Why waste money on something that can be had cheaper providing that having a lower profile doesnt have any negative effect?