If it plays Bad Company 2 fine then I don't see an issue with BF3...you're all acting like it's Crysis in 2007 again
Battlefield 3 thread - Server details in opening post -
- Thread starter [TFU] Thegoon84
- Start date
- Status
If it plays Bad Company 2 fine then I don't see an issue with BF3...you're all acting like it's Crysis in 2007 again
the game is just tweaked medal of honor omg i need 4 580 gtx for like 60 fps 
think use the brain they need it to run on not to high pcs and consoles minimum and think of what med range cards are and what are high .
a quad and a 460gtx or ati 5830-50 will play this at recommened guarenteed .
at end of day they need it to sell they arnt doing it for a laugh
think use the brain they need it to run on not to high pcs and consoles minimum and think of what med range cards are and what are high .
a quad and a 460gtx or ati 5830-50 will play this at recommened guarenteed .
at end of day they need it to sell they arnt doing it for a laugh
the game is just tweaked medal of honor omg i need 4 580 gtx for like 60 fps
That's 4xGTX 580's for just 1280x1024 res as well!
OH NOES!
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2010
- Posts
- 7,058
- Location
- Bedford
Didn't know that a woman was involved in the BF3 development aswell!!
(yes I am sexist!!)Btw 'BF3 beta coming soon' probably means another 3-4 weeks before it is released
the game is just tweaked medal of honor omg i need 4 580 gtx for like 60 fps
think use the brain they need it to run on not to high pcs and consoles minimum and think of what med range cards are and what are high .
a quad and a 460gtx or ati 5830-50 will play this at recommened guarenteed .
at end of day they need it to sell they arnt doing it for a laugh
You're not factoring in the ultra settings which according to dice is very demanding on systems. People seem to be basing performance on the alpha which was lacking lots of options.
Im sure therell be a lot more options to tweak in the beta. Moh is a pretty smooth running game for me, on max settings @1920x1200, 4x aa, 16x af im hitting 180fps.
80 max in the tunnels section on the alpha.
Maybe so but the alpha didn't have dx11 effects like Tessellation, video options did next to nothing, destruction on that map according to dice was toned down a lot for the alpha as well. The alpha was not a good indicator of performance in any way. Beta apparently will have Tessellation included, whether it has any actual video setting that do anything will be interesting.
Last edited:
Preorders on origin get 48 hour access before it goes public.
Got to love the resolution snobbery
Funny, no really quite funny. I cant see how its snobbery when realistically 1900x1200 isnt a particular high rez its mid to high in the grand scale, and someone who feels the need to chuck 800 quids worth of gfx cards at it and doesnt think BF3 will play on high and would consider 2 590's isnt thinking the same as most people. Thats potentially 1 thousand two hundred pounds on gfx cards to run a game on a mid sized screen, its hard to figure.
Perhaps getting a bigger and higher rez screen would be better use of the money?
Wheres this coming from?
Associate
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 605
Yup, I have no plans to update my GTX560Ti as I only have a 22" monitor that is native to 1920x1080. It will run the game good enough for me to play it, and besides, I have much more important things to spend a few hundred quid on.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2008
- Posts
- 1,580
- Location
- Glasgow
I think it its to do with that change to the battlelog website, they said battle log will be back 1th (typo) of september. People are taking that to mean they meant 1st of september, or even 11th (missed the one). They promptly took it off.
Apparntly, I never saw the screen grab but thats what has been said.
- Status