I have a [email protected], 16gb ram@1500, and recently swapped a gtx 460 768mb to a gtx570 1.3gb.I can now run 95% of my games at 1080p with max details and 4aa no problems.However 3 of the games are still very much CPU bound, GTA4, ARMA 2, and Crysis.
Ive read unconfirmed reports around the net that theres a big difference in these games going from a phenom to sandybridge, can anyone verify that?GTA4 can drop to 25fps in places (avg around 40), arma 2 in big towns down to 20, and crysis still feels a little sluggish.
Im aware neither ARMA 2 or GTA 4 are coded particularly well and crysis is a system hog but I cant shake the feeling that an i5 or i7 sandybridge might make a big difference.Anyone have any experience with a phenom and sandybridge in this scenario?Worth upgrading?Its annoying having 1 part you feel is letting you down and the money spent to cure the minor annoyance to most would be worth it if indeed the differences are noticeable
I also use After Effects so the Multi Threading would be a bonus, although I currently dont have problems with the speed on it.
Ive read unconfirmed reports around the net that theres a big difference in these games going from a phenom to sandybridge, can anyone verify that?GTA4 can drop to 25fps in places (avg around 40), arma 2 in big towns down to 20, and crysis still feels a little sluggish.
Im aware neither ARMA 2 or GTA 4 are coded particularly well and crysis is a system hog but I cant shake the feeling that an i5 or i7 sandybridge might make a big difference.Anyone have any experience with a phenom and sandybridge in this scenario?Worth upgrading?Its annoying having 1 part you feel is letting you down and the money spent to cure the minor annoyance to most would be worth it if indeed the differences are noticeable

I also use After Effects so the Multi Threading would be a bonus, although I currently dont have problems with the speed on it.
Last edited: