Need help with revenge........

Jono8 · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:28

This thread is disturbing.

Morte · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:29

....or he could MTFU and help to pay for his child?

paddy · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:38

Watch a couple of episodes of Dexter, should cover everything

rustynuts · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:46

He could nail her sister or mother, that should **** her off..

TNGL · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:46

She's not only taking his money, she's taking your inheritance.

matt0r · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:48

Salmon in her curtain rails is the best option ... tinned obviously

before anyone quotes this is not a strangled metaphor ...

wannabedamned · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:52

Transfer all his assets into your name.

233 · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:52

you need to get it on with your dads ex and take videos,

post said videos onto interweb

Randomface74 · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:53

doddsy105 said:
Long story short, my dads ex wife has split up with him after a year and they have just had a child and now she's basically taking all his money

ALL his money?
OR
enough to raise the child properly?

Tyrone77 · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:54

I'm afraid to post in this thread on account of having to supply a statement to the police about my 'involvement' of a murder!

StriderX · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:56

Tyrone77 said:
I'm afraid to post in this thread on account of having to supply a statement to the police about my 'involvement' of a murder!

Irony?

Brian8bit · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:57

billysielu said:
enough to raise the child properly?

Which is relative. The richer the individual, the more money the woman usually takes so they can maintain the level of comfort they are accustomed to. If they wanted the actual amount of money it takes to raise a child, it would be a fraction of what they usually end up getting. Case in point, Heather Mills £25 million payout.

The total was £24.3 million, plus payments of £35,000 per annum, for a nanny and school costs for their daughter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Mills#Divorce

Jono8 · 17 Sep 2011 at 19:59

StriderX said:
Irony?

not really

Jono8 · 17 Sep 2011 at 20:00

matt0r said:
putting a rail into her Salmon curtains is the best option ... tinned obviously

matt0r · 17 Sep 2011 at 20:03

Jono8 said:

^TANK^ · 17 Sep 2011 at 20:04

Randomface74 · 17 Sep 2011 at 20:10

Brian8bit said:
Which is relative. The richer the individual, the more money the woman usually takes so they can maintain the level of comfort they are accustomed to. If they wanted the actual amount of money it takes to raise a child, it would be a fraction of what they usually end up getting. Case in point, Heather Mills £25 million payout.

The child belongs to both of you. You *should* treat it like it's priviliged with your joint incomes. The problem is that fathers think their responsibility ends when they're no longer getting any.

Morgoth · 17 Sep 2011 at 20:11

billysielu said:
The problem is that fathers think their responsibility ends when they're no longer getting any.

What a load of nonsense.

matt0r · 17 Sep 2011 at 20:14

billysielu said:
The child belongs to both of you. You *should* treat it like it's priviliged with your joint incomes. The problem is that fathers think their responsibility ends when they're no longer getting any.

just as not all women in divorce are gold diggers, not all single fathers are uncaring deadbeats.

/ontopic

Now OP did you get any salmon?

Brian8bit · 17 Sep 2011 at 20:18

billysielu said:
The child belongs to both of you. You *should* treat it like it's priviliged with your joint incomes. The problem is that fathers think their responsibility ends when they're no longer getting any.

I never said that it didn't belong to either or that a man should shun his responsibility. Only that the cost of raising a child properly doesn't cost as much as some women like to milk from their former other half.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/feb/23/cost-raising-child#data