The 4S is 'just' an upgraded iPhone 4. However, it does have some considerable upgrades such as -
So, it's nothing massively exciting. People are upset about it for a few reasons -
- Dual-core processor, up from single core
- Considerably more powerful GPU
- 8MP camera with improved optics, up from 5MP
- 1080p video recording with stabilisation, up from 720p
- Siri voice assistant, could be good (could be bad)
- 64GB option, so double storage effectively (but at a cost)
- Extra antenna that will improve signal quality and stop dropped calls when you have a very weak signal and 'hold it the wrong way'
They wanted an iPhone 5 with a redesign (metal back like the iPad 2), and a 4" screen. I wanted this, and I'm a bit disappointed we didn't see it, but we will eventually. This is the main problem.
They had to wait more than a year for the update.
That hardware specs didn't (though they were never going to) leapfrog the likes of the Galaxy S II, there would have been no good reason for Apple to do that as the 4S specs provide more than enough power, just like the Galaxy S II does now. It will still provide a more than adequate amount of power 2-3 years down the line, I'm sure.
The standby battery life appears to be worse, though it's unlikely that will make much of an impact on anything at this point.
It doesn't really give iPhone 4 users a brilliant reason to upgrade.
Sounds like a decent phone for someone willing to use iOS.
An aluminium body would certainly be desired in a phone that costs as much as an iPhone and larger screen sounds like a must-have feature to compete with the current generation smartphones.
4-4.5" is certainly a sweetspot for these powerful phones, after all they have enough power to handle most mobile applications at decent resolution.
I think the hardware specification upgrade should be pretty noticeable so iPhone 4S looks like a decent phone to consider.