Associate
- Joined
- 14 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 160
- Location
- Worcestershire
Have sent a power supply back to OCUK today as it's faulty. I asked if I would get my postage costs back, and was told no. Isn't this against the Sale of goods act?
Should be refunds in both cases, almost all top online sellers offer free post back. If not against the SoGA it usually puts consumers buying off those sellers in the future.
was it a DSR return or RMA? how long had you had it?
Should be refunds in both cases, almost all top online sellers offer free post back. If not against the SoGA it usually puts consumers buying off those sellers in the future.
Had a look on the money saving expert forums. Apparently the Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000 say that the seller has to pay the cost of returning faulty items. No exceptions.
Had a look on the money saving expert forums. Apparently the Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000 say that the seller has to pay the cost of returning faulty items. No exceptions.
I've been to the OCZ website which confirms the following;
"Shipping Costs:
The customer is required to pay shipping and handling charges to send the defective product to OCZ.
OCZ provides free return shipping and handling to the following countries:"
I'm pretty ****ed off to be honest, the main reason why I bought the PSU is it had a 5 year warranty - If i'd have known that the warranty is effectively worthless due to the company been based in holland I would never have considered this item!
Surely as it never worked they must me liable for the cost of the shipping!?!?
It's quite simple...
Faulty on DELIVERY = Seller takes all the hit for the costs.
Working on DELIVERY = Seller has done their part.
If it then fails within a certain time period, I believe OcUK are liable for the postage costs, but you MUST prove that the goods were not fit for purpose at time of sale.
If that time period passes, the product then falls under RMA, at which point you (the buyer) are liable for return costs.
At least that's my understanding of the DSA and Consumer Rights act.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/54F4048B
Repair or replacement of the goods
(1)
If section 48A above applies, the buyer may require the seller—
(a)
to repair the goods, or
(b)
to replace the goods.
(2)
If the buyer requires the seller to repair or replace the goods, the seller must—
(a)
repair or, as the case may be, replace the goods within a reasonable time but without causing significant inconvenience to the buyer;
(b)
bear any necessary costs incurred in doing so (including in particular the cost of any labour, materials or postage).