NYPD officer ko'd defensless protestor !!!

It'd never be acceptable? Under no circumstances?

I can't think of any..
The police have had all the training in the world to arrest someone without using excessive force, there is no need for a police man to punch someone.
Even if they were attacked, they could just arrest the person using their normal technique.
 
If someone takes a swing at a police officer they deserve to get hit back imo
with equal force sure , im all for it people do stuff during protests thinking they can get away with it stuff they wouldnt normally try like hitting a copper and hoping to disapear back into the mob
 
If you look about on the internet there is an article about this event.

There are three videos from different angles that pretty much capture the whole thing from start to finish.

Simple as the white shirt walking up behind the civilian, saying something like, "move to the sidewalk please". Civilian just gives him a look and walks away. Cue white shirt grabbing him, pulling him about, and landing one right in the face.

Democracy at its best.
 
Wow...
Which part of a policemans job description involves retaliation?
They are here to enforce the law, not distribute justice..

I'm pretty sure they are allowed to defend themselves...

The bloke in the vid did go a bit OTT but at the end of the day the protestor won't be hitting him or causing harm to anyone else.
Also I would rather take a punch to the chops than get a belt with a batton any day of the week.
 
Police officers are allowed to go 'one step above' what's just happened to them aren't they?

I.e they get hit, they can pepper spray back etc?
 
I'm pretty sure they are allowed to defend themselves...

The bloke in the vid did go a bit OTT but at the end of the day the protestor won't be hitting him or causing harm to anyone else.
Also I would rather take a punch to the chops than get a belt with a batton any day of the week.

Of course they can defend themselves, but a punch to the face is incredibly excessive. There was not a problem arresting that man after the punch, he could have quite easily arrested him instead of punching him right in the face.
 
*BANG*
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
 
throw a punch at a copper = get knocked out. can't see the problem

There is a large problem with that, where does the line get drawn? Getting knocked out is way past the line of self defence, if there is no line then what stops them from seriously injuring someone just because they made a stupid decision when heavily drunk?
 
Of course they can defend themselves, but a punch to the face is incredibly excessive. There was not a problem arresting that man after the punch, he could have quite easily arrested him instead of punching him right in the face.

If the other vids show the person in green to be non-agressive the I totaly agree with you, however if the person in green threw a punch/slap then they deserve everything they got as had the police man not reacted they could have quite easily slipped into the crowd without being arrested.
 
If you look about on the internet there is an article about this event.

There are three videos from different angles that pretty much capture the whole thing from start to finish.

Simple as the white shirt walking up behind the civilian, saying something like, "move to the sidewalk please". Civilian just gives him a look and walks away. Cue white shirt grabbing him, pulling him about, and landing one right in the face.

Democracy at its best.

I'm sure that can't be true as the OCUK detectives here have already determined off that obscured YouTube video that the hippy initiated the occurrence by launching an unprovoked attack on the policeman and got everything he deserved... :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom