They could at least be somewhat attractive..
Looks don’t appear to be a factor. They want it. You’ve got, They’ll pay for it.
They could at least be somewhat attractive..
Have you got this the wrong way aroundLooks don’t appear to be a factor. They want it. You’ve got, They’ll pay for it.
The argument that it's not is on the basis that they just want a breadwinner, which is a different situation entirelyexactly! it's just prostitution
B@
Looks don’t appear to be a factor. You want it. They've got, You’ll pay for it.
Iv fixed that for you![]()
It's just a rich guy willing to splash the cash to keep a relationship, could be for a male/female partner.i thought a sugar daddy was a gay thing?
At least I heard it on Will&Grace first so that's probably where my missunderstanding is from.
No sex, it's literally just escorts, except they're the ones approaching the limited number of guys.It's still whoring for money, I'm struggling to see the difference between this and the illegal kind.
You asked what the legal difference was, that's it. Escorts are legal the same way that these are.Well they have to say that don't they. Like hell there isn't an option to include the full service in the arrangement.
At least the genuine trollops are honest about it, even if it is illegal![]()
I want a sugar mummy![]()