24 Oct 2011 at 17:41 #21 baron02 baron02 Associate Joined 8 Aug 2009 Posts 783 Location Canterbury,Kent Windows 7 64bit Formatted about 2 weeks ago. Uploaded with ImageShack.us Uploaded with ImageShack.us
24 Oct 2011 at 17:48 #22 Deception Deception Soldato Joined 23 Apr 2006 Posts 6,500 Location Nottingham Ive got 68 at the moment on home PC. Will check work one tomorrow once I get in.
24 Oct 2011 at 17:55 #23 Cosimo Cosimo Man of Honour Joined 9 Jan 2007 Posts 164,718 Location Metropolis I've got 85 using 3GB (25%) of memory. Win 7 64-bit Ultimate.
24 Oct 2011 at 18:08 #24 InfiniteNoise InfiniteNoise Associate Joined 3 Feb 2011 Posts 1,246 105 processes (23 Chrome tabs open), 43% memory used.
24 Oct 2011 at 19:01 #25 mrk mrk Man of Honour Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 106,177 Location South Coast Less than I previously thought, 80 with 21% RAM used. 90s must have been when I have PS and LR in the background
Less than I previously thought, 80 with 21% RAM used. 90s must have been when I have PS and LR in the background
24 Oct 2011 at 19:04 #26 yashiro yashiro Soldato Joined 9 Dec 2003 Posts 3,624 Location UK Win 7 Home Premium - 41
24 Oct 2011 at 19:11 #27 Zero Pope Zero Pope Associate Joined 13 May 2011 Posts 1,657 Win 7 Ultimate SP1 - 82
24 Oct 2011 at 21:06 #28 madindehead madindehead Soldato Joined 30 May 2009 Posts 4,638 Location Maidenhead Windows 7 Pro x64 - 100 right now
25 Oct 2011 at 02:36 #29 Stoner81 Stoner81 Associate Joined 8 Jul 2010 Posts 2,264 Location Derbyshire Stoner81.
25 Oct 2011 at 03:02 #30 agw_01 agw_01 Soldato Joined 11 Apr 2004 Posts 19,943 44 running at present. And that includes a couple that shouldn't really be there. I'm pretty particular about what I have running on my machine.
44 running at present. And that includes a couple that shouldn't really be there. I'm pretty particular about what I have running on my machine.
25 Oct 2011 at 08:37 #31 Deception Deception Soldato Joined 23 Apr 2006 Posts 6,500 Location Nottingham Deception said: Ive got 68 at the moment on home PC. Will check work one tomorrow once I get in. Click to expand... At work, I've only got 42 running. Quite a difference from home!
Deception said: Ive got 68 at the moment on home PC. Will check work one tomorrow once I get in. Click to expand... At work, I've only got 42 running. Quite a difference from home!
26 Oct 2011 at 02:04 #32 iakhtar iakhtar Associate Joined 29 Oct 2009 Posts 146 58 running at the moment
26 Oct 2011 at 02:10 #33 Locke Locke Soldato Joined 8 Oct 2006 Posts 5,645 Location Clifton, Bristol 94 o_O Surprising!
26 Oct 2011 at 08:57 #34 Deception Deception Soldato Joined 23 Apr 2006 Posts 6,500 Location Nottingham Locke said: 94 o_O Surprising! Click to expand... It's amazing how the processes have increased since the days of Windows xp. I remember when I always tried to keep them around 30 or less.
Locke said: 94 o_O Surprising! Click to expand... It's amazing how the processes have increased since the days of Windows xp. I remember when I always tried to keep them around 30 or less.
26 Oct 2011 at 09:40 #35 Burnsy2023 Burnsy2023 Man of Honour Joined 17 Nov 2003 Posts 36,750 Location Southampton, UK Deception said: It's amazing how the processes have increased since the days of Windows xp. I remember when I always tried to keep them around 30 or less. Click to expand... Counting the number of processes is a pretty arbitrary thing to do. It doesn't have any bearing on performance.
Deception said: It's amazing how the processes have increased since the days of Windows xp. I remember when I always tried to keep them around 30 or less. Click to expand... Counting the number of processes is a pretty arbitrary thing to do. It doesn't have any bearing on performance.
26 Oct 2011 at 09:45 #36 mrk mrk Man of Honour Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 106,177 Location South Coast And the number of idle processes will naturally increase anyway. Today's OSes do a lot more behind the scenes than the OS of the last generation.
And the number of idle processes will naturally increase anyway. Today's OSes do a lot more behind the scenes than the OS of the last generation.
26 Oct 2011 at 10:07 #37 Deception Deception Soldato Joined 23 Apr 2006 Posts 6,500 Location Nottingham Burnsy2023 said: Counting the number of processes is a pretty arbitrary thing to do. It doesn't have any bearing on performance. Click to expand... I didnt know much back then, probably still dont!
Burnsy2023 said: Counting the number of processes is a pretty arbitrary thing to do. It doesn't have any bearing on performance. Click to expand... I didnt know much back then, probably still dont!
26 Oct 2011 at 12:12 #38 Django x2 Django x2 Soldato Joined 28 Sep 2008 Posts 14,261 Location Britain 62 here, that's about normal for a w7 machine but stupidly high for an XP machine