Battlefield 3 thread - Server details in opening post -

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's good but suffers the usual Battlefield problem of too much trekking around.

Still, that's what you get for having big maps and epic battles I guess.
 
That is just bad aiming. :p

I dont think its bad aiming everty time.

The target is on the persons head and you get the indication of a hit.
Yet the dont go down.

I see this quite a bit in BC2 - the player has only their head over a rock for example, you get a hit but its not a kill.
Now surely that has to be a head shot, or am I missing something??
 
The gameplay is very good. But the map design is awful. Most of the maps were clearly designed for rush before conquest was considered. Just hoping they dont mess with B2K too much, but no doubt they will.
 
Just had a bash on single player for a hour, and wooooooooooooo!

i aint eva played single player on shooters, and that jet mission is AMAZZZING!
 
I am soo disappointed with BF3, does not feel at all like BF2. The maps are tooo small for 64man, soo laggy every game and hit reg sucks bad :(

Graphics looks awesome, but the gameplay just sucks :( Who else agrees? Dont be afraid to speak up!

it is pretty bad, i still haven't bought it but at one point i had such high hopes. the days of battlefield are over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom