Unseen 9/11 footage shows WTC Building 7 consumed by fire

AcidHell2 said:
That entire paragpah is total fail.

Yes steal buildings do fall from fire alone and no need for jet fuel. Look up Windsor tower fire in Madrid for a steel tower collapse from fire.
Click to expand...


Very true..but you forget to say that the Windsor tower fire in Madrid burnt from the 21st floor down to the 2nd floor for 18-20 HOURS.

WTC 7 only lasted half that time with very small fires on 5 floors(I think) compaired to the Madrid one.
 
deuse said:
Very true..but you forget to say that the Windsor tower fire in Madrid burnt from the 21st floor down to the 2nd floor for 18-20 HOURS.

WTC 7 only lasted half that time with very small fires on 5 floors(I think) compaired to the Madrid one.
Click to expand...

But the partial collapse happened after ~2hrs.
Using how long it burnt for is silly. As the wtc has fires for weeks underground.
 
deuse said:
Very true..but you forget to say that the Windsor tower fire in Madrid burnt from the 21st floor down to the 2nd floor for 18-20 HOURS.

WTC 7 only lasted half that time with very small fires on 5 floors(I think) compaired to the Madrid one.
Click to expand...

I think you've conveniently left out a fuel source.

SteveOBHave said:
I feel at this point that it's extremely important to point this out.

NO ONE CARES!!!
Click to expand...

Please don't speak for me.
 
dmpoole said:
I think you've conveniently left out a fuel source.
Click to expand...


You mean the 'Magic' Jet Fuel that jumped from WTC2 into WTC7 to burn that down too? Maybe the alien 'Controlled Demolition' squad had invisible pipelines, as apparently we need aliens to demolish buildings now as we don't have the technology according to someone else in this Thread. :D

I also can't see WTC7 collapsing top down in any video, but that must be me getting mind-controlled by the Govt. :cool:
 
deuse said:
I thought members was on about the time frame for the building to collapse\Fie ect not after...
Click to expand...

That was my point, you said Windsor tower burnt for 18-20hrs. It did but the partial collapse of the steel part of the building collapse well before that iirc around two hours.
So including the full burn time skews the information.
 
doofer said:
You mean the 'Magic' Jet Fuel that jumped from WTC2 into WTC7 to burn that down too? Maybe the alien 'Controlled Demolition' squad had invisible pipelines, as apparently we need aliens to demolish buildings now as we don't have the technology according to someone else in this Thread. :D

I also can't see WTC7 collapsing top down in any video, but that must be me getting mind-controlled by the Govt. :cool:
Click to expand...

What jet fuel, you don't need jet fuel. Perhaps you should go watch some videos again. Theres a section on the roof that collpase before the main collapse.
 
It amazes me that you lot through some 'astounding' ability to garner information fed to you through youtube and the media think that either side of the opinion can conclusively prove the other wrong. It's a pointless argument that has no end, not the least because the majority of you are too stubborn to accept that the other may be right.

This thread needs a warning on the title "Rocket Surgeons at work"...
 
SteveOBHave said:
It amazes me that you lot through some 'astounding' ability to garner information fed to you through youtube and the media think that either side of the opinion can conclusively prove the other wrong. It's a pointless argument that has no end, not the least because the majority of you are too stubborn to accept that the other may be right.

This thread needs a warning on the title "Rocket Surgeons at work"...
Click to expand...

If you are going to suspect anything but the obvious - that Islamic terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into buildings, such that they caught fire and collapsed - then you had best have some very compelling evidence. The CTs do not.

It's an insult to those who died, to be honest.
 
gillywibble said:
Such a ridiculous thing to say. No tragedy should ever be investigated because people died?
Click to expand...

Did he say that?
I don't think so. It's the blanket lying that is offensive that normall people here and vpbelive. I have absolutely no doubt that loose change and the others. Know they are lying.
 
Vonhelmet said:
If you are going to suspect anything but the obvious - that Islamic terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into buildings, such that they caught fire and collapsed - then you had best have some very compelling evidence. The CTs do not.

It's an insult to those who died, to be honest.
Click to expand...

In my opinion the insult was from the muppets that felt that it was their religious and moral right to kill thousands of people. The CTs are just idiots with an overly argumentative lean fuelled by an overinflated sense of their own intelligence. The people arguing the contrary are feeding their ideas that their theories must have credence because if it weren't true then why are people trying to deny it? It's ultimately a foolish circular argument. None of you are competant structural engineers or physicists with intimate knowledge on the specifics of the event so none of you can conclusively prove anything. Good luck... Whilst the compelling evidence may exist, it's not going to materialise on an IT forum in the UK.

dmpoole said:
Yes, I like these threads, you obviously don't so stay out if it upsets you.
Simples.
Click to expand...

Sure I will, but do me a favour - if this thread ends in anything other than a stalemate and failure to prove anything that either side can agree to please let me know. Otherwise, knock yourselves out...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom