Battlefield 3 thread - Server details in opening post -

Sasso · 7 Nov 2011 at 20:59

Booner! said:
Why don't people who can't fly learn on an empty server, just got killed three times on [TFU ] CONQUEST | UK | NORMAL | OCUK | by people desperate to get the chopper! James_sasso threatened to ban me for commenting, so going to avoid that server if that's the attitude.

Going back to Bonken to avoid the power trip admins of the TFU servers

lol, i can vaguely remember the events of this but i do believe you were having a right go at someone obviously new. our servers are for people of all player levels, not just elitists like you obviously are

also you wouldn't shut up about the damm thing and we were all getting annoyed by the stupidly big chat box coming up so i was just trolling you in the hope you would let it go

feel free to play on the servers as everyone is welcome*,

*you know who you are...p.s. we look forward to banning you again

Gerard said:
Aye, have to love 12 year olds who think theyre god with admin privelages. Seems to be more and more of them these days looking for any reason possible to get off by kicking or banning someone.

you love 12 year olds o.O ..... sorry to disappoint but i am of legal age limit

Caffrey said:
CQ Metro is madness and occasionally fun with the right teams.

TFU + admin abuse seem to go well together.

yea that map seems to be a complete bottleneck around the B point, who know escalators could be so deadly!

think you will find that we are hardly abusing our powers. telling someone to be quite who is repeatedly abusing another player as they might not be that good.....kicking idle players to make room for people who are waiting to join. people repeatedly spawn raping after being warned. and well think i've only issued a ban to one person and they know who they are

to be honest I am not one for abusing the powers that i have been bestowed with by the all high and mighty goonah, and dont kick/ban on a whim. if you are kicked/banned there will be a reason, will not be without warning and is usually discussed before any action is taken. we want our servers clean and that's the way it's going to stay

Good Luck and Play Safe.... Your Friendly TFU Server Admin

Gerard · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:01

Sasso said:
you love 12 year olds o.O ..... sorry to disappoint but i am of legal age limit

Amusing, take you all night to come up with that side splitting piece of humour?

Sasso · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:03

Gerard said:
Amusing, take you all night to come up with that side splitting piece of humour?

mulled it over with a glass of wine actually

Gerard · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:04

Sasso said:
mulled it over with a glass of wine actually

barmyllama · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:05

PapaLazaru said:
It is the new graphics drivers. When they sort it out it wll be fine. Remember the same happened when both BF2 and BC2 came out?

You'd have thought they'd has sussed it by now.

DICE games are always buggy, clunky and prone to crashing.

I don't think I'll be buying anymore Battlefield games again, at least not until a good 6 months after release.

Sasso · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:08

xD good gif

and barmyllama, this was joked about so much over mumble saying how it's just going to be another bc2 release with a mountain and weeks of patches before it's properly playable... we weren't far wrong. i personally blame EA for wanting to release before MW3 came out

Witcher1979 · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:08

AMD already fixed msaa with 11.10

I can now max everything on a single 6950, but I use 2x msaa so I get 45+ fps, even on large 64 player servers. Everything else on ultra. If I go 4xmsaa I drop to 40fps.

Pighardia · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:34

After a few nights of playing on 32 player servers i doubt i will play much 64 player again tbh, it is much better. atm that meas the TFU conquest'#2 is my server of choice,are there any other 32player ocuk servers in the pipeline? all the ones i have favourited seem to be 64 atm.

MasterPlan1 · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:35

Anyone know why my BF3 just gets stuck on loading screen? It does nothing... Just constantly sitting there, using CPU, and not chomping memory..

elitehacks · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:39

my brother kept telling me before this came out, that my computer couldnt run it n stuff.
so yesterday he came in my room and i was playing it with most settings on ultra at about 45 fps average lol
im very impressed and surprised that my rig can perform this well:
amd athlon dual core 3ghz (am2+)
4gb ddr2 kingston hyperx 800mhz ram
320gb sata 2 western digital cavier blue
coolermaster v8 cpu cooler
thermaltake element g case
ocz 700w modxtreme psu
sum old asus mobo XD

trigger-happy · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:39

It will be nice if you guys can give your say on my thread http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2832654489452857021/ Its about the loading screen and how much it sucks. I made a crappy concept (on paint) which kinda resembles BF2.

Sasso · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:45

MasterPlan1 said:
Anyone know why my BF3 just gets stuck on loading screen? It does nothing... Just constantly sitting there, using CPU, and not chomping memory..

mine does this too, usualy on first load it takes 3 tries to get in, first one outright crashes, second one just sits on a blank screen... not crashed.... apparently im playing but not screen... just sitting at 200 fps so have to alt-f4 it and then the 3rd loads up find and it fine all night then

oldbag · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:46

Argh, sometimes I rage out of this as everyone else seems to have a 7X scope and kill me from seemingly no-where.

Pighardia · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:46

^^triggerhappy- I have +1'ed it, it is a bit of a no brainer tbh. It should have been like it from the start. Another corner cut :rolleyes:

trigger-happy · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:49

Pighardia said:
^^triggerhappy- I have +1'ed it, it is a bit of a no brainer tbh. It should have been like it from the start. Another corner cut

thanks

stokecity_m · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:49

Ok i've just tried 4-5 hardcore games and seem to be doing better on them ( still crap mind) i think it's down to the fact the bullets do more damage

as although on normal my first shots hit, not enough hit to kill them.

Strife212 · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:49

The loading screen is the one point where I truly think they have just ported it over from the console and truly couldn't be bothered. The size is what gives it away, it doesnt even fill up the screen.

RobSmith · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:51

elitehacks said:
my brother kept telling me before this came out, that my computer couldnt run it n stuff.
so yesterday he came in my room and i was playing it with most settings on ultra at about 45 fps average lol
im very impressed and surprised that my rig can perform this well:
amd athlon dual core 3ghz (am2+)
4gb ddr2 kingston hyperx 800mhz ram
320gb sata 2 western digital cavier blue
coolermaster v8 cpu cooler
thermaltake element g case
ocz 700w modxtreme psu
sum old asus mobo XD

Sorry, but I call BS.

Pighardia · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:52

stokecity_m said:
Ok i've just tried 4-5 hardcore games and seem to be doing better on them ( still crap mind) i think it's down to the fact the bullets do more damage as although on normal my first shots hit, not enough hit to kill them.

I would like to play hardcore but in its current state i just can't, half the time i do not see any indication above enemies so would kills so many team members.
In a game earlier there was a guy laying prone with his name in green(squad member!!!) so i ran past him, next thing i know i am dead and he has killed me! :mad:

Deific · 7 Nov 2011 at 21:53

For anyone having unbearable rage, try 32 man games. For me it improved my experience 10 fold, far more enjoyable, more team work, less rocket spam, less being spawn killed etc.