The core of a great battlefield is the maps and they have 100% been dumbed down to cater for the COD crowd, even the so called air maps have all the action clustered in the middle of the map. This was done to cater for consoles and 24 players, 64 players and only 5 caps all clustered together on a big maps is just wrong.
Other gameplay features dumbed down are things like unlimited ammo for all vehicles and aircraft, fire and forget guided missiles on jets and choppers. Health regeneration for infantry and vehicles. Squad management is a joke currently.
I agree with most of your points but how is missile lock and flares any different from real life? Also, with BC2 you had unlimited fire on many of the vehicles where atleast with BF3 you have to reload after a point. And if you don't like regen why not play hardcore?
Neo, its clear you dont like the game and you've made your feeling well known. Its getting a bit 'trolly' now tbh.
All i'l say on the matter there is no other current FPS title out atm that comes close to BF3. MW3 is pure **** and anything else is simply old! Its not a trash game, MW3 is a trash game... The game imo has been HUGELY improved from BC2... so i'm happy.
I'm happy with BF3, i'm looking forward to KArkand, our guys are currently getting plenty of ladder matches and win's which says to me the game is heading in the right direction.
I refused to buy COD this year because of a lack of innovation. Essentially MW3 is just a re badged MW2 which makes me sick.
The aiming is console based.
BF3 requries basically no skill.
sure you can use team/squad using teamspeak to work togeheter, but I didnt need that for Bf2.
BF3 is a EA adapted to kids and noobs who cant aim, and the core mechanics just plain suck.
Since when has BF3 been about your aim? If you want that go play Quake/UR2/CS???