'man' feeds kitten to his pet snake

Robbo · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:23

cheets64 said:
No, I never said I would.

Glad to hear it!

Robert1986 · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:24

Watched the video, the fasion the kid did this is very cruel. You feed snakes mice and rats, not kittens. Its cruel. That cat could have been given a home with a loving family.

steve-h · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:24

Glaucus said:
And how does that change anything, what's the difference between the poor cute fluffy rat and the annoying snarling cat that poos in everyones garden.

That makes zero sense.

How does it being dead change anything? I was replying to someone :confused:

How does the lack of suffering change anything? :confused:

Look how the guy kills the kitten, then look how mice are killed for snakes.

Also the mice I buy are pretty ******* cute.

Scougar · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:25

cheets64 said:
One of the things that rile me up is when I see a cat hunt for birds in my street, its not doing it for food but for fun, this video is actually someone feeding their pet.

It's not feeding, it's entertainment for the owner of the snake.

Glaucus · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:25

Scougar said:
People may be emotionally attached to domestic animals, but it still doesn't make it OK.

Trying to win an argument by calling laws 'emotional' is utter tripe, and would get you know where in a proper debate except to make yourself look foolish, except to distract from the actual topic. Your trolling, stop it. (I've deliberately left "Your" in place so someone can pointlessly think they are incredible at the English language and pick up on it and waste a post).

It's not tripe, becuase they are. They certainly aren't based on facts or evidence.

For example why can I not breed cats for food?
Why was fox hunting banned, when the report said other still legal methods cause just as much distress.
Why can't I eat song birds?

Lightnix · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:26

In this topic: people defend obvious sociopath because they think disliking cute things is cool.

Glaucus · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:26

steve-h said:
That makes zero sense.

.

You said that even if you fed your snake live mice, it would still be wrong for cats. Why? Where's your logic in that.

Scougar · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:26

Glaucus said:
And how does that change anything, what's the difference between the poor cute fluffy rat and the annoying snarling cat that poos in everyones garden.

Argueing just for arguments sake? Do you dislike cats?

Glaucus · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:27

Scougar said:
Argueing just for arguments sake? Do you dislike cats?

I don't mind cats and the animal makes no difference and that's the issue.
Its certainly not arguing for the sake of OT. It's arguing becuase so many of you have double standards that aren't logical.

Tummy · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:27

Oh not one of these cat threads again, wait Kitten? That's worse right?

Also, I fed one of my dead gold fish to next doors cat once, circle of life innit :cool:

Tummy · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:29

LOL Just reminded me of the episode of Shameless where the Pug gets eaten by the snake and then has a Pug shaped blob in the snake

Scougar · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:30

Glaucus said:
It's not tripe, becuase they are. They certainly aren't based on facts or evidence.

1) For example why can I not breed cats for food?
2) Why was fox hunting banned, when the report said other still legal methods cause just as much distress.
3) Why can't I eat song birds?

1) Probably because there is a law against it? (Honestly don't know on the legalities because I'm not screwed up enough to go looking for bizarre things like that)
2) Because it's cruel. Please tell me how shooting a fox is better than it being mauled by dogs after it's exhausted? I don't actually have a problem with fox hunting, and don't really care, but the 'end result' is the fox being mauled, don't be fooled into thinking it's not another way.
3) Songs birds? Are they a protected under law?

Efour · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:31

lol what a pair of freaks vaccum kitten killer and snake feeder man... Post it on Youtube??

One sandwich short of a picnic.

Not threats to socieoty but not quite compos metis.

Are they yanks ? or Ukers i didnt read that far

Glaucus · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:32

Scougar said:
1) Probably because there is a law against it? (Honestly don't know on the legalities because I'm not screwed up enough to go looking for bizarre things like that)
2) Because it's cruel. Please tell me how shooting a fox is better than it being mauled by dogs after it's exhausted? I don't actually have a problem with fox hunting, and don't really care, but the 'end result' is the fox being mauled, don't be fooled into thinking it's not another way.
3) Songs birds? Are they a protected under law?

1) yes it's against the law, why. You saying my argument that laws are based on emotion rather than evidence.
2) then why aren't the other methods banned
3) yes protected by law

So basically you came in here know nothing. As said my argument that laws are based on emotion and public opinion, rather than evidence is stupid.

So common show we hpwhat facts these laws are based on. Or is it that I am actually right.

steve-h · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:35

Glaucus said:
You said that even if you fed your snake live mice, it would still be wrong for cats. Why? Where's your logic in that.

If kittens were killed in as humane way as mice are then I wouldn't care.

That is hugely off topic though :confused:

Scougar · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:36

Glaucus said:
I don't mind cats and the animal makes no difference and that's the issue.
Its certainly not arguing for the sake of OT. It's arguing becuase so many of you have double standards that aren't logical.

"In some parts of the world people eat other people. If I ate one of your kids I'd just say you have double standards." > It's a bit far fetched, but that's basically your arguement. I'll wait for you to bring up the 'but that's people, it's different'

LeJosh · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:36

Glaucus said:
1) yes it's against the law, why. You saying my argument that laws are based on emotion rather than evidence.
2) then why aren't the other methods banned
3) yes protected by law

So basically you came in here know nothing. As said my argument that laws are based on emotion and public opinion, rather than evidence is stupid.

So common show we hpwhat facts these laws are based on. Or is it that I am actually right.

What are you jibbering on about? Ofcourse a lot of laws are based on emotion.

It isn't all or nothing and rightly so.

Glaucus · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:37

steve-h said:
If kittens were killed in as humane way as mice are then I wouldn't care.

That is hugely off topic though

That's not what you said, you said even if it were alive.

But anyway.
You have no problem with mice or cats as long as they are fed dead. Living be it rats or cats is bad.

Glaucus · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:37

Scougar said:
"In some parts of the world people eat other people. If I ate one of your kids I'd just say you have double standards." > It's a bit far fetched, but that's basically your arguement. I'll wait for you to bring up the 'but that's people, it's different'

You call my arguments stupid. Really read back what you have just written.

Muzza1875 · 3 Dec 2011 at 19:37

cheets64 said:
this video is actually someone feeding their pet.

No its someone killing an innocent creature for some sort of sick and twisted pleasure.If you look at these two other videos of the SAME person you will see its not just a case of someone feeding there pet but a sick and twisted little **** that needs to be put to death!.

So far this guy/monster has killed 4 cats 1 to his pet snake, 1 to drowning and another by suffocating.

Can everyone who are saying this is just a guy feeding his pet please shut the **** up.