Why are there such strict rules on cats and dogs and not on other animals?
rats, (as you brought them up) are vermin in category. heck, i think they're the only living thing that the SAS are told never to eat.
And rats are the only other animal and shouldn't have the same rights on sufferingThat doesn't make much sense.
Why can I farm oyster animals for food and not dogs.
or bring it down on anyone who supports wigan. bye bye cheets64, you just got double hammered![]()
(oyster animals - other animals?) other countries do, we don't.
Humans needs lots of laws to function as a society. That includes murder, so no it's not the same. It's a throw away stupid argument. Well it's not even an argument it's just stupid.
Yep
We can't. It's against the law. Why? What's the reasoning?
It's emotional, it makes no sense. It's not based on any evidence. Other that fluffy aninimal syndrome. As shown in this thread by many outraged people (not all). The problem wasn't the act as they aren't freaked out by live rat feelings, but they are cats. That makes no sense and shows it has nothing to do with suffering or the actual act. Those that have objected to both I have no issue with. It's the double standard in the vast majority of the population and contained in our laws.
Why not eat humans? If you're going down the cold hard unemotional logical route....
Why not eat humans? If you're going down the cold hard unemotional logical route....
i get your point, to an extent but the bottom line is, some animals are now domestic, some are bred for food, some are vermin.
there's health issues
There's also issues with who owns the bodie or loved ones/family left behind.
And in fact as far as I know heating humans isn't against the law in uk, but it is impossible to obtain human meat as murder is illegal., strict laws on corpse handling and disposal. All sensiable laws due to the risk involved.
It's still a pointless argument and adds nothing to this debate.
But there's zero reason for it to be that way. There is no reason why I shouldn't be able to bread cats, dogs for food. No different to domestic iced rabbits and farmed rabbits. It's emotional crud that doesn't make any sense and even you can't seem to defend such laws or people's reactions.
Just becuase it's the law, doesn't mean we have to agree with it, or agree that it makes sense..
expensive to keep, dangerous to keep en mass for farming, represent a health risk if used for large scale food production, produce very little meat for the cost.
that and it takes about 16-18 years to grow one compared to months for regular domestic animals.
For the cold hard unemotional logical route there is no reason to eat people.
Why not eat humans?
But you could provide equal arguments against farming cats for food too...
But you could provide equal arguments against farming cats for food too...
no market for it so no money in it.
.
for someone trying to take the cold logic approach you seem to be focusing on pure emotional views.