[TW]Fox;20722710 said:
They don't have no downside, they have reduced aquaplaning performance and lower dry performance with only marginal wet braking improvements so its not as simple as that. Just a compromise. You must choose what matters to you because its nothing like as clear cut as you claim.
As last year there were only two nights of significant snowfall here the benefits for me personally are outweighed by the disadvantages.
I wouldn't call 20% marginal.
But it would seem that dry/wet braking seem to almost even out from the figures presented in that article, leaving just Aquaplaning and Snow performance being left.
In my experience, the times I've felt I've been exposed to risk in these two situations, by a country mile it would be snowy conditions that pose the overwhelming threat in the winter months..
Last winter was pretty bad in Gloucestershire, the snow only fell a few nights, but it stayed for a couple of weeks at least, and since I ventured down to plymouth, and saw first hand the conditions in a lot of places there, to just say it had 2 nights of snow, as if it all suddenly disappeared and went back to normal roads the next day is highly inaccurate IMO.
Shame we can't get the stats, but I'd wager the accidents due to aquaplaning vs accidents due to snowy conditions would give us the information we need, I think it would indicate winter tyres being the right choice over the colder 2 or 3 months by some degree, clearly you think the opposite..