Muslim girl gang escape jail after judge hears 'they weren't used to drinking because of their relig

Witness reports of a stated desire to kill.
Medical evidence supporting that.
Video evidence supporting that.
Admission by the attackers of the nature of their attacks.
Witness reports of a racist element.

Dismissing the witness reports as unsubstantiated is one thing, but what's your reasoning for dismissing the medical evidence, video evidence and admissions by the attackers of what they did?



Obviously not the case.

Sorry for the delay, I ask again. Source?

I haven't been able to read the thread since page 4 but I'd be surprised if any law has been quoted beyond what I said.
 
You can see why people like Emma West feel frustrated with the messed up state Britain is in today. No she shouldn't have ranted and sworn on the tram perhaps, but she was only articulating the anger and frustration many of us share.

Correction, a minority of racists share.
 
Anyway I was just wondering how the Somali authorities would treat a gang of white English women, if they beat up a Somali Muslim in Somalia. Several years in some hellhole of a prison at the very least I imagine. Followed by being deported.

(Actually does Somalia have authorities? Probably just warlords isn't it? So the aforementioned white girls would probably just be executed summarily.)

And what does that matter in this case? The crime was ocmiitted in Britian and the women sentenced under Birtish law. Maybe the sentence was wrong, who knows without all the evidence.

You claim to be a "native" British so you are problebly mix of Italian and german, perhap with maybe some viking, celtic or pictish blood. If you commit a crime you be shipped off to Germany or Italy and be sentenced there?
 
LOL this explains a lot.

What does it explain?
The bullies that kicked me on the ground and shouted verbal abuse, and probably threatened to kill at least once didn't actually intend to kill me.

Soon enough I took matters in my own hand and learned self-defense, and in doin so gained a much higher position in the school social hierarchy with little problem from bullies. My point is merely to say, kicking somone on the ground happens all the time and it doesn't make for attempted murder.
 
He is deluded or a self righteous liberal fag.

Funny how at one moment I can be called a liberal fag and the other an extreme right wing nut job. Guess that puts me slap bang in the realms of normality, thank goodness.

FYI, I voted Conservatiuve the last 2 elections and hate the extreme left as much as the extreme right.
 
BTW there are plenty of racist terms that are used against white people.

None of them are in English however.

I cant understand how dense people trying to sympathise with the attackers and claiming that they were not racist can get.

I don't know anyone who is sympathising with the attackers??:confused:

Maybe they were racist, maybe not, who know without the evidence. The one person who has the experiecne, the evidence and the powered - i.e the judge- decided the attack wasn't racially motivated. I trust him and the legla system, not a biased tabloaid and racist forum posters. Maybe I'm wrong, who knows, none of us have the complete facts.
 
+1

This is what i was trying to get at earlier, the attack may well have been racially motivated but without knowing more(the events prior to the attack really) we can't say that it was.

If someone stole my wallet and ran off and i tackled them to the ground and beat them up(unlikely!!), If i called them a 'black ****' the attack would not be racially motivated. We do not know why they kicked off, as i say it might well have been racially motivated, but it is not a foregone conclusion.

Exactly the point I have been trying to make.
We don't know the context, what happened before, etc. The Judge didn't beleive it was a racially motivated attack so either the judge is wrong (highly unlikely), or it was not a racially motivated attack. he Judge has no personal gain in not sentencing these women.
 
So why is the Stephen Lawrence murder treated as racial? No proof other than his friend said they shouted some racist abuse.

Not saying it was racial or wasn't, personally i can't conclusively say but going by the replies on here from others somebody suggesting it was racial doesn't mean it was without proof as they claim the white woman who got beat up and her boyfriend can only make claims it was racial, there were no sounds captured so they cannot prove it was racial. Isn't this the same for Stephen?

Genuinely interested, i'm trying to work out what the difference is.
Everyone was drunk. A lot of things get said when people are drunk. Just because they shouted "Kill the white..." during the brawl, it doesn't mean it the fight was started solely due to her being white.

There are hundreds of things which could have motivated the attack. Racial motivation is a possibility, but we don't have the full picture of the events.
 
Last edited:
Exactly the point I have been trying to make.
We don't know the context, what happened before, etc. The Judge didn't beleive it was a racially motivated attack so either the judge is wrong (highly unlikely), or it was not a racially motivated attack. he Judge has no personal gain in not sentencing these women.

Haha yeah cos British judges never get it wrong seeing as how totally in touch they are, right.
 
I don't know anyone who is sympathising with the attackers??:confused:

Maybe they were racist, maybe not, who know without the evidence. The one person who has the experiecne, the evidence and the powered - i.e the judge- decided the attack wasn't racially motivated. I trust him and the legla system, not a biased tabloaid and racist forum posters. Maybe I'm wrong, who knows, none of us have the complete facts.

Next you'll be telling us that anyone who considers this crime to have racially aggravating factors is a racist.
 
Verbal racist should be punished, completely agree but don't you agree that physical racial attacks deserve stiffer sentences than verbal abuse?? Both completely abhorrent but i know i'd rather be called a honky than beat up.

I disagree that verbal acts of racism should be punishable, all such cases have unfair bias and contradict free speech.

If a white man came up to me and threw any kind of racist insults, I could if I wanted to report the case to the police and have him sued / fined / jailed???

If I went up to a white man and started flinging racist verbal abuse, no one other than the person I was abusing would bat an eyelid. If he tried to report this to the police, they wouldnt do a thing against me, and other far leftist apologists would completely defend my actions as not being racially motivated.

I couldnt even get in the sllightest bit of trouble for being only 'verbally' racist towards a white person, but if they were to only say one of two words - N***** or ****, I could have them sued / fined and be compensated for racism, and non of the far leftists would defend a white man over a brown / black man.
 
Did a Google search on this and found the Millwall fc forums..... needless to say it was full of LOL comments :D
 
I am going to put exactly the same as I put on facebook.

This is an outrage, if it was 3 white women kicking a muslim's head in, it would be a totally different story. And no one can deny that.
 
well look on the bright side..their parents and brothers will be so ashamed they will murder them and dispose of the bodies..hurrah for honour killings after all!
 
I am going to put exactly the same as I put on facebook.

This is an outrage, if it was 3 white women kicking a muslim's head in, it would be a totally different story. And no one can deny that.

indeed, you only have to look at this thread to see the outrage felt at a white woman using racist language. However when minorities try to kill a white person somehow some people are able to excuse it.:confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom