Witness reports of a stated desire to kill.
Medical evidence supporting that.
Video evidence supporting that.
Admission by the attackers of the nature of their attacks.
Witness reports of a racist element.
Dismissing the witness reports as unsubstantiated is one thing, but what's your reasoning for dismissing the medical evidence, video evidence and admissions by the attackers of what they did?
Obviously not the case.
Sorry for the delay, I ask again. Source?
I haven't been able to read the thread since page 4 but I'd be surprised if any law has been quoted beyond what I said.
