Another tram experience... 96 year old WW2 veteran beat by a black man, gets no jail time

dirtydog said:
But that's the point. In this country, non whites typically get treated more leniently by the courts than whites do. Discrimination against whites, aka anti-white racism.
Click to expand...
Interesting point that non whites get treated more leniently

Care to back it up with some statistics over a measurable period of time ?

Do you think the tram woman should be languishing in prison today and over Christmas while people like this man, or that Somali Muslim gang who tried to kill that white girl by repeatedly kicking her in the head on the floor, walk away scot free?
Click to expand...

Yes I do think that woman should be in prison. The mistake you are making is comparing entirely different crimes and then using race as your barometer of fairness. Because some white woman is in prison and some black guys aren't then it must be because the black guys get a better deal. All three should be in the nick.

Again it's an issue of the law being applied equally and fairly. If the judge or magistrate (in most cases, white) lets the black guys off then it's a failing on the application of punishment.
 
Rich_L said:
Oh right, 3 media-worthy cases can be extrapolated over the whole justice system can they?

Just more evidence of the bizarre alternative reality that you reside in to justify your odd views.

Oh look, actual evidence which completely contradicts your totally baseless assertion...http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/nov/25/ethnic-variations-jail-sentences-study
Click to expand...

TBH I follow these issues closely and these three cases are FAR from unique or exceptional in any way. They are typical.
 
More delusional nonsense from the depressing alternative reality you inhabit.

If ever there was a glaring case of confirmation bias, it's you - you lap up any and all information to support the miserable reality you have constructed for yourself to justify your laziness and unwillingness to make anything happen for yourself.
 
Last edited:
dirtydog said:
Skin colour is but a small facet of race, educate yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_terminology_for_race

Whites (who don't even actually have 'white' skin, we aren't the colour of tippex) broadly means the peoples of northern Europe.

Blacks broadly means the peoples of Africa.

And so on.

And I'm not and have never been a white supremacist, which you can verify by reading any of my posts here past and present, or anywhere else on the web such as Stormfront.
Click to expand...



See, this illustrates what I am saying, you decide to sidestep the issue by telling me to educate myself about Race, whilst ignoring the actual point raised as to your predisposition towards the colour of someone's skin, or their Race if you prefer.

You may not think you are a white supremacist, however you do have similar views to traditional supremacists, including adherence to racial purity and the forced removal of non-whites from what they perceive to be their indigenous lands.....while you may not advocate (or at least state openly) that non-Whites should be subservient to Whites or are inferior to Whites there are instances where the implication could be interpreted, such as your attacks on their cultures and the generalisations made against their predominant religions and traditions......

You state that you are concerned for the cohesion of society in the face of mass immigration and in some respects I would have concerns also, however where my concerns would be in the segregation and sheer number of immigrants in such a short period of time and the adverse effects this has on infrastructure, housing and social cohesion and integration of these immigrant populations within society, yours seem predominantly based on their differences with the emphasis firmly placed on their colour or race....and the stated aim that Britain should be reserved for its alleged indigenous White population. This underlines your entire argument and detracts from anything of substance that you have to say on the subject of immigration.
 
Last edited:
Castiel said:
See, this illustrates what I am saying, you decide to sidestep the issue by telling me to educate myself about Race, whilst ignoring the actual point raised as to your predisposition towards the colour of someone's skin, or their Race if you prefer.

You may not think you are a white supremacist, however you do have similar views to traditional supremacists, including adherence to racial purity and the forced removal of non-whites from what they perceive to be their indigenous lands.....while you may not advocate (or at least state openly) that non-Whites should be subservient to Whites or are inferior to Whites there are instances where the implication could be interpretation, such as your attacks on their cultures and the generalisations made against their predominant religions and traditions......

You state that you are concerned for the cohesion of society in the face of mass immigration and in some respects I would have concerns also, however where my concerns would be in the segregation and sheer number of immigrants in such a short period of time and the adverse effects this has on infrastructure, housing and social cohesion and integration of these immigrant populations within society, yours seem predominantly based on their differences with the emphasis firmly placed on their colour or race....and the stated aim that Britain should be reserved for it alleged indigenous White population.
Click to expand...

Nope I don't advocate forced removal of people unless they are foreign born and have been convicted of serious crimes.

Nope I don't consider any other races to be inferior to me.

In short, I am not a white supremacist. And those who are, I don't identify with. THEY are racist, they hate people just for their race. I don't. No really, I don't.
 
Rich_L said:
More delusional nonsense from the depressing alternative reality you inhabit.

If ever there was a glaring case of confirmation bias, it's you - you lap up any and all information to support the miserable reality you have constructed for yourself to justify your laziness and unwillingness to make anything happen for yourself.
Click to expand...

dirtydog do you even have a job / pay taxes :confused::confused:
 
dirtydog said:
Nope I don't advocate forced removal of people unless they are foreign born and have been convicted of serious crimes.
Click to expand...


So the Black or Asian person born in the UK has every right to be here and has equal entitlement to all services and privileges that our society can and does provide.....

That is your stated opinion?

dirtydog said:
Nope I don't consider any other races to be inferior to me.

In short, I am not a white supremacist. And those who are, I don't identify with. THEY are racist, they hate people just for their race. I don't. No really, I don't.
Click to expand...

The problem is that because of your emphasis of particular traits of the individual and how you frame and present your arguments on this Forum and others, many people believe otherwise and as I tried to point out earlier (instead you focused on telling me to educate myself!) this perception of you is created in part by yourself, and I feel that until you address this perception (or misconception if you are to believed) then you will continue to be branded a racist and bigot and you will also continue to attract those that you state you cannot and do not identify or agree with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom