According to Mr Main, the idea of two single tickets was presented to him by a member of staff when he purchased his ticket(s) at Polmont Station at 8am that day. He reasoned that, because he was travelling before 10am, he could not use his 16-25 railcard to purchase a discounted return, and was advised to purchase two single tickets instead.
The video doesn't show us the sequence of events that occurs before he resorts to swearing to emphasise his statements.
Respect for your elders? What you seem to be arguing is that Mr Main was obliged to give the train conductor an extraordinary level of respect based solely on his age? Age shouldn't enter into it.
Where in the video does he express an unwillingness to pay?
I'd return your dictionary and ask for a refund if I were you.
abuse
verb
Pronunciation: /əˈbjuːz/
[with object]
1use (something) to bad effect or for a bad purpose; misuse: the judge abused his power by imposing the fines
make excessive and habitual use of (alcohol or drugs, especially illegal ones): at various times in her life she abused both alcohol and drugs
2treat with cruelty or violence, especially regularly or repeatedly: riders who abuse their horses should be prosecuted
assault (someone, especially a woman or child) sexually: he was a depraved man who had abused his two young daughters (as adjective abused) abused children
(abuse oneself) euphemistic masturbate.
use or treat in such a way as to cause damage or harm: he had been abusing his body for years
3speak to (someone) in an insulting and offensive way: the referee was abused by players from both teams
So you agree with my statement, as I entered this thread, that the 'big man' should be prosecuted for assault? Excellent!![]()
Footage of one of their customers being assaulted by a member of the public as a member of their staff stands idly by, giving his blessing to the intervention before it takes place, has been viewed by millions of people.
I feel ashamed to be a member of any society that doesn't view that as sufficient grounds to place the company in disrepute.

Was he assaulted? Yes, he was. Was the 'big man' extremely foolish (i.e. a lunatic) to assault him? Yes, he was.
Look up the definition of hyperbole![]()
Again, where are you going with this? People who disrespect others can be justifiably assaulted?
Who cares if he was disrespectful? It's not a crime to be disrespectful. By all accounts, the conductor was being just as disrespectful to him as he was to the conductor.
I'll ask again. Where in the video does he express an unwillingness to pay?
How his speech in the video can be construed as "insulting and offensive" is truly beyond me. He used the f-word to express dissatisfaction, and to emphasise otherwise entirely reasonable and inoffensive statements. At no point does he appear in any way intent on insulting or offending anyone concerned.
How his speech in the video can be construed as "insulting and offensive" is truly beyond me.

[TW]Fox;20807641 said:Edinburgh Park does not have ticket barriers.
They would, but they don't exist.
They would need to be fitted before they were able to be in operation.
It would be unreasonable to assume a station with no barriers had barriers which would swallow a ticket.
It would, were it not a fabrication created to give credence to your arguement.

Did you even bother to read the quote I provided? To clarify a minor point, it was Mr Main's uncle who stated the idea was presented to him by staff at Polmont Station, but that shouldn't bear on the statement. It would have been Mr Main himself who told his uncle as much, assuming his uncle was not present at the time.
I'm not party to the employers of the ticket folk at Polmont Station.
Disrespect does not constitute abuse. Disrespect is not, in itself, "insulting and offensive".
Do train conductors really have the legal authority to forcibly remove people from trains? Genuinely interested on that point.

Not quite. Asking you to provide supporting evidence for a claim you keep making. You keep failing to provide supporting evidence. I would suggest this is because there is, in fact, no supporting evidence. That's just a hunch, though...
Techinically the guy was assaulted.
Sensible head says, the guy was being a jerk and got what he deserved.
Absolutely. I must have watched it a dozen times now.
How anyone can interpret his use of swearing, largely limited to statements such as "I've showed you my ****ing ticket" and "Aye, I ****ing have [paid]!" as "insulting and offensive" is beyond me![]()
You keep failing to provide supporting evidence. I would suggest this is because there is, in fact, no supporting evidence
