How about a Camel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:C...en_-_On_the_Anatomy_of_Vertebrates_(1866).jpg
That image really shows how what we think of as a knee on the back limb is actually the "ankle", with the camel walking on the ball of it's foot.
How about a Camel?
leg/leg/
Noun:
Each of the limbs on which a person or animal walks and stands
Dogs, cows, etc. have four legs as far as I am concerned![]()
Yeah well, a Hard drive is that big box sitting next to the monitor that the mouse and keyboard plug into...
It's common usage outside of computer literate circles so must be true...![]()
Yeah well, a Hard drive is that big box sitting next to the monitor that the mouse and keyboard plug into...
It's common usage outside of computer literate circles so must be true...![]()
Actually I'd be inclined to say there are no mammals with more than 2 legs. I'd be interested to see if anyone want to prove me wrong there.
Wyverns have two legs![]()
Elephants, the only animals that actually have 4 legs (2 sets of knees). Everything else has 2 arms and 2 legs (one set of knees and one set of elbows).
That's a pretty strange definition of leg.
Can you name a 4 legged animal that flies?
Elephants, the only animals that actually have 4 legs (2 sets of knees). Everything else has 2 arms and 2 legs (one set of knees and one set of elbows).
That's a pretty strange definition of leg.
Got a link to that as the anatomy I've seen still explains it as "arms".
leg/leg/
Noun:
Each of the limbs on which a person or animal walks and stands
Dogs, cows, etc. have four legs as far as I am concerned![]()
where does anatomy say they are arms?
Becuase arms evolved from legs. So if anything, it's the other way around and arms are legs. The fact they have shoulders and elbows. Doesn't mean they aren't legs. Why do all legs have to have a pelvis and knee? They simply don't.
Show us this scientific term. You keep saying it and posted nothing to back it up.
.
Which scientific term is it you are looking for? Definition of arm? I don't think I've said they have any arms, just they weren't legs, however looking at the images I've linked to above I'm starting to think they may indeed be called arms
EDIT: Interesting thought about arms evolving from legs, however that would suggest that humans also have 4 legs, which would confuse this thread even more.![]()
Wow... is this debate STILL going on?
I'm looking for any scientific discription that says legs can't have shoulders or elbows. Can you not give that?
Even the medical definition includes
3. any of the four limbs of a quadruped.
And no it's not odd, arms and legs share the same evolution route. So it really isn't strange they share certain parts, seeing as we probably named are parts before animals it's no surprise at all.
And doesn't show why scientifically they are not legs. You have shown one scrap of info why they aren't classified as legs.
OED said:an animal which has four feet, especially an ungulate mammal:
OED said:the lower extremity of the leg below the ankle, on which a person stands or walks.
a corresponding part of the leg in vertebrate animals.