Woman sets honeytrap, forum posters back her

Status
Not open for further replies.
PhillyDee said:
Here is the link.
So im doing what magnolia doesn't want me to do, tough!

http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/relationships
Click to expand...

After having been scrolling through that labyrinthine warren of sheer ass-hattery and oestrogen fuelled mentalists searching for said thread, I was rather pleased to find someone had handily, mercifully infact linked the thread....


Well played Mr Dee. I return to South Shields on the 5th March. Mark my words, I shall hunt you down with a stick. :mad:

:D
 
The Funktopus said:
After having been scrolling through that labyrinthine warren of sheer ass-hattery and oestrogen fuelled mentalists searching for said thread, I was rather pleased to find someone had handily, mercifully infact linked the thread....


Well played Mr Dee. I return to South Shields on the 5th March. Mark my words, I shall hunt you down with a stick. :mad:

:D
Click to expand...

nah, dont go for the stick, thats far too kind. hit him with a spoon again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again :p
 
TJM said:
...

Penetrating a woman who hasn't consented is rape. If you think it's impossible to commit rape inside a relationship or that rape requires a degree of violence, you'd best check the law.
Click to expand...

You're missing a very important point:

I hadn't used a special safe word we have used before,
Click to expand...


So they have a history of playing with consent. That's why they've agreed a safe word, i.e. a word that actually means 'no'. Which she didn't use. Given that they were doing something they'd done before, that she did not say 'no' (didn't use the safeword) and that he can't read her mind, the situation is far from being the simple one you describe.
 
Anyway, back to the OP...

Due to her own psychological issues, she doesn't trust him. She intercepts his emails, creates fake identities to acts as entrapment agents, the whole nine yards, and continues until he makes a reply that might or might not be falling for the entrapment. She then hatches a plan to defraud him out of a lot of money. This is generally seen as being OK.

I wonder if the response would be the same to the same scenario with the sexes swapped round.

Actually, no, I don't wonder. I'm sure it wouldn't be.
 
pingwing said:
How many people are trolling mumsnet right now? Every thread iv clicked on in it to try and work out the one the OP was on about has a post (from the second to the 6th) that basically says WOMEN YOU CAN'T HAVE NICE MEN BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO USE CORRECT PUNCTUATION ON THIS SITE!

Least I have some proof for the "most women are crazy" theory.
Click to expand...

No you don't. You don't have any proof and you don't have much more evidence than someone who reads about a mugger who happens to have relatively dark skin and concludes that most "blacks" are dishonest and bestial. Either way, it's just bigotry looking for a false veneer of rationalisation.
 
d_brennen said:
Jeez, it's like a female OcUK GD with no mods. Won't somebody think of the children!
Click to expand...

There's a lot more jargon there, apparently created to keep outsiders at bay, and I think they have less "spec me" threads.

But yes, I get the same impression. Although I think it's more sexist than here, overall. It would be very surprising if it wasn't, given that anti-male sexism is so much more socially acceptable than anti-female sexism in the vast majority of English-speaking places.
 
Last edited:
KNiVES said:
Mumsnet is basically one of the worst community websites on the internet and generally should always be avoided. They aren't representative of their target demographic in any way shape or form and are incredibly militant and single minded.
Click to expand...

Which means they have some power and seek more, which means they can't be avoided. Mainly due to an intelligent choice of name to which to attach their actual target demographic (which is, like all advocacy groups, "people who agree with us") to.
 
I'm not surprised the relationship section is full of misandry.

The fact that the overwhelming majority of posts are in regards to bad relationships could be a good reflection of those that dwell in that part of the forum.

I must say though that I find some of the posts a little disturbing. The way in which some refer to their husbands and partners seems very detached and disloyal, as if they are talking about a stranger to whom they happen to be married.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom