Well of course you can't....and I am not really all that surprised.
Sick in the head or a justified sense of humour?
- Thread starter Robbo
- Start date
Well of course you can't....and I am not really all that surprised.
Why would that be 'eh Castiel? Going to extend your powers of telling me what I meant in my posts to telling me why I can't be bothered to reply?
the bloke in the op should be sacked, how anyone can find this kind of thing not a little bit disturbing i find a little strange.
and lol @ castiel and tummy arguing over SP, come on, it's nearly the weekend but tbf castiel, read back what you have responded with, you come across as a little bickering child ''don't call me stupid'' etc.
and lol @ castiel and tummy arguing over SP, come on, it's nearly the weekend but tbf castiel, read back what you have responded with, you come across as a little bickering child ''don't call me stupid'' etc.
Your attitude.....you made an antagonistic reply to what was an honest misunderstanding....while I have acknowledged my part in this, you still will not admit that "Can you not read...." etc is not really the best way to clarify a position or is it likely to illicit acceptance of your position...
So it doesn't surprise me at all that you cant be bothered to acknowledge that or that simply denying something is not clarifying something.
Last edited:
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,639
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Good grief Castiel & Tummy, there are worse things going on such as this poster who posted this
But he's still going!
and you are not of course.....
With a username like Bumhug who is really surprised?
Anywhere nice?
My attitude
It's taken you this long in the 'argument' to pick up on the 'antagonistic' reply which was in reply to your statement telling G-MAN what I actually meant, (Not something that pleased me, instead of asking me what I meant you decided to try and tell people what you thought I meant, despite my post clarifying the matter) Despite him pointing out that I didn't call you stupid and me clarifying I didn't call you stupid.
Yes, my post was ambiguous, but that's irrelevant because I'd cleared the ambiguity up in the next couple of posts. You've just ignored several of my points though out this 'argument' too.
You've flown off the hook, telling me what I meant (when I didn't) and being overly sensitive with me saying your reaction was daft.
I'll drop it, but I don't accept that Tummy has been entirely blameless in all this...there was no need for the initial and continued antagonism to the misunderstanding....(which if you read my initial post wasn't taken particularly seriously anyway)
Anyway, my apologies for my part in it all.....consider it dropped.
Coventry.
