Maybe I have misunderstood, but you think 30 minutes is to short a time from callout to start working? I guess it depends how critical the system is but if where I work no one started looking at a problem for 30 minutes the company could literally be losing hundreds of thousands of pounds. We generally have to be looking at a problem within about 10 minutes.
Maybe I have misunderstood, but you think 30 minutes is to short a time from callout to start working? I guess it depends how critical the system is but if where I work no one started looking at a problem for 30 minutes the company could literally be losing hundreds of thousands of pounds. We generally have to be looking at a problem within about 10 minutes.
I think you must have misunderstood.
In a period where you may be out having a meal, sleeping, or doing one of a million activities you can be available, online and working within 10 mins?
BTW hundreds of thousands is small-fry for the systems my teams support (literally) and we have a maximum response time of 30 mins, and attendance in the office within a maximum of 2 hours.
I'll soon be lumped with the "pleasure" of going on-call for my current employer within the next couple of months, and am somewhat apprehensive about it for the sole fact that the remuneration is abysmal. Witness:
Doing 1 week in 4, for each evening that you are on standby you are provided 1 hour's flat rate wage. Time and a half at weekends. Essentially, for an entire week on standby you receive 1 days' extra pay.
If you're called, you get paid time and a half or double time, depending on the date/holidays etc., which you log in increments of 15 minutes work time. This can be taken as paid, or time in lieu.
Put simply, I would refuse.
It's well below market rate. If, as a manager, I tried implementing that (forgetting all leadership morals as i wouldn't ever cover it for that cash) I would have everyone currently on an on-call agreement tell me they wouldn't do it any more, and raise a grievance.
In all, I'd hate to work for you! You want to pay lower than the going rate for the hourly rate, not pay any additional rate if contacted, and you don't trust your staff. Some manager!
Maybe I should have posted originally but right now it is £50 a week and I am doing it all myself because it is such a crap rate of on call I can't possibly expect my team to do it.
You'd never get the job... far too much time posting on OCUK.

Maybe I should have posted originally but right now it is £50 a week and I am doing it all myself because it is such a crap rate of on call I can't possibly expect my team to do it.
You'd never get the job... far too much time posting on OCUK.
Maybe I should have posted originally but right now it is £50 a week and I am doing it all myself because it is such a crap rate of on call I can't possibly expect my team to do it.
HAHAHA, yeah right
HAHAHA, why on earth did you ever accept that?!
Seriously though, just because you're getting the shaft doesn't mean your staff won't want a reasonable pay. Yours is very, very unreasonable but that doesn't make a £200 flat rate right.

Don't do it?
Ouch!
Your company offers a 24/7 support structure...
Your company charges clients to offer that service...
You get paid nothing to do it... company makes pure profit on your slave labour...
... I don't understand why anyone would do that willingly unless you have a very good salary starting point that's over the odds for your role...
Considering it is for Systems, I am the Systems Manager answerable to the CEO and the Board... it is not really an option.
