Cycle safety campaign

Capodecina
Soldato
Joined
30 Jul 2006
Posts
12,130
** No hotlinking **

At last, something positive from Murdoch's PR machine:
The Times said:
The reality with any major issue is that it only truly touches you when it comes close to home. However regularly you may cycle on Britain’s city streets and however aware you are of the risks of doing so, it is not until you have seen one of your closest friends and colleagues stretchered off the tarmac from beneath the wheels of a lorry only yards from the office that the vulnerability of cyclists hits home.

Mary Bowers is a news reporter at The Times. She joined the paper as a graduate trainee in September 2009, though her beaming smile and effusive personality were common sights around the office from previous roles as a researcher on the comment and foreign desks.

With a passion for social affairs investigations and witty features, she has a writing style that is as distinctive as her sharp, quirky dress sense. She also has a remarkable singing voice, and it is an honour to have been one of those lucky enough to perform with her on several occasions in the folk clubs of London.

Yet it is only by a hair’s breadth that we are still able to talk about Mary in the present tense. Her survival to this point, now almost three months since her accident in London at 9.30am on Friday, November 4, is down to the passers-by who stopped and called the emergency services.

It is down to the paramedics who arrived on the scene within three minutes, to the fire crews who cut Mary and her mangled bike from beneath the wheels of the lorry, and to the doctors and nurses in the intensive care unit of one of the city’s busiest hospitals. But Mary cannot thank them herself. Not yet. Not for a long time. Possibly never. Because, though she is stable, Mary is still not conscious and remains in a trauma unit. Her broken legs, arm and pelvis are slowly healing, but other damage sustained during complications in her treatment, almost inevitable after so traumatic an injury, will be far harder to overcome, though she is making slow progress.

There are also people Mary would not want to thank. There are the authorities who have neglected to ensure that junctions like those on The Highway in Wapping — or countless others where cyclists have been maimed and killed in Britain — are made safe for cars, lorries and cyclists to co-exist safely.

Mary, a news reporter, would be first to ask why it is not mandatory for lorries driving on city streets to be fitted with sensors and mirrors to pick up cyclists in their blind spots. Or why training for cyclists and drivers on how to share the road responsibly is so poor. Or why some junctions are so dangerous that jumping a red light can actually be a safer option than lining up alongside HGVs at the lights like a racetrack starting grid. Or why London trails so far behind cities such as Amsterdam and Copenhagen in terms of the infrastructure and legislation to protect vulnerable cyclists and to help the drivers who are trying to avoid them.

But such questions are not a priority at the moment for Mary’s sister, Laura Fawcett, whose constant support by Mary’s bedside has been a source of strength not only to Mary, but also to the huge circle of friends, colleagues and loved ones who are guarding her in their thoughts.

Laura said: “I’m angry that the accident happened and that it was even possible for it to happen. Mary’s nurses said to me that, if I’d seen what they see all the time in intensive care, I would never cycle again. It is just so random and cruel, but it feels like so many of these things can be prevented by increasing awareness and changing road structures.

“Mary is such a loving person and a real people-person, which attracts so many people to her and is why so many people she had come to know around the world are concerned about the tragedy and horror of what happened.”

There are many families who are not able to visit their loved ones in hospital, because they did not survive. “My husband had a human right to cycle to work and come back home again alive,” said Debbie Dorling, whose husband Brian was killed in October last year on his way to work.

As a point of comparison: since 2001, 576 British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq; 1,275 cyclists died on British streets. The latest data shows there were 1,850 deaths or serious injuries in the first half of 2011, a 12 per cent rise on the year before. Britain leads the world in competitive cycling; it is time that we did the same for the cyclists on our streets.

Drivers and cyclists need to realise that co-existing safely benefits everyone, in terms of public health, traffic, pollution, and congestion on our roads, trains and buses.

The Times is launching a cycle safety campaign not simply to call for safer roads, but to outline exactly how that can be achieved, in a way that will hold transport authorities and politicians to account. Too many cyclists have died on the streets of Britain. Too many families have lost their sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, husbands and wives.

It is time for that to change. (NO LINK)
I genuinely hope that this is more than a cynical PR campaign. Anything that makes cycling safer and encourages more people out of cars and onto their bike can only be a good thing.

ps - I hope that Mary Bowers makes a full and speedy recovery and that her pain and suffering achieve something positive :)
 
Last edited:
whoops , sorry got the wrong idea.

However tragic this is when are cyclist going to have compulsary road insurance ? Until this happens I dont think you stand a car in chances hell of othe road users listening to a single cyclist.
 
Last edited:
I am all for the campaign as long as it targets everyone i.e pedestrians, cyclists and motorists alike and doesn't just stop at motorists like the majority of campaigns do.

EVERYONE has an EQUAL responsibility for road safety.
 
However tragic this is when are cyclist going to have compulsary road insurance ? Until this happens I dont think you stand a car in chances hell of othe road users listening to a single cyclist.

Never, because 5-year-olds ride bikes. There's no test, no minimum age limit and no restrictions whatsoever, so insurance will be the last of those to come into effect.
 
This article even made the front page today:

thetimes01.jpg

Something does need to be done to protect them from vehicle blind spots in city centres but education and individual responsibility must also be a part of any safety campaign. Without the later we won't get very far.
 
I'd like to know the situation behind her casualty, ie exactly what happened. For you to be in a lorry's blind spot you either have to be sneaking up the side of them from behind which is a stupid idea or have to be overtaken in which case they should see you when you were originally in front.
 
More decent cycling paths please.

Fixed ;).

They've put in a new cycle lane in Bristol that is just plain awful and dangerous.

This is what they've done (pink lines are new cycle lane):

Iomia.jpg


So instead of just getting into the correct lane to go right, cyclists are now able to stay in the left hand lane the whole way and then suddenly cut across traffic going straight on. Whoever thought that would be a good idea or designed it needs shooting as it's simply ridiculous, although it's probably been done just to meet some cycle lane criteria.
 
Last edited:
Why cyclists never use them, our council spent millions building some of the best ones in Europe and the fools still ride in the road because "its their right" >.>

According to a cyclist at work, it's because cycle lanes get full of crap so they're more likely to get a puncture. Personally I'd rather risk getting a puncture than risk getting hit by a vehicle travelling at 70mph. Maybe it's a good idea for the council to sweep the cycle lanes once a week like they do on the roads? There's no easy solution to the fundamental problem in this country that our roads are inadequate and being shared by too many different vehicle types.
 
According to a cyclist at work, it's because cycle lanes get full of crap so they're more likely to get a puncture. Personally I'd rather risk getting a puncture than risk getting hit by a vehicle travelling at 70mph. Maybe it's a good idea for the council to sweep the cycle lanes once a week like they do on the roads? There's no easy solution to the fundamental problem in this country that our roads are inadequate and being shared by too many different vehicle types.

As well as being badly surface they also usually give priority to junctions and driveways etc, can be very narrow for two-way traffic (especially when they're shared use and you include walkers and dogs) and generally take a rubbish route. For example to turn right you'd have to dismount, cross the lane (if possible), cross the road etc rather than just turning right normally.
 
According to a cyclist at work, it's because cycle lanes get full of crap so they're more likely to get a puncture. Personally I'd rather risk getting a puncture than risk getting hit by a vehicle travelling at 70mph. Maybe it's a good idea for the council to sweep the cycle lanes once a week like they do on the roads? There's no easy solution to the fundamental problem in this country that our roads are inadequate and being shared by too many different vehicle types.

There are usually uneven surfaces and sunken grids on the curb edge, considering our roads in this country have been negelected for the last few years.
 
In london I think the biggest issues with cycle safety is those terrible black fences that the councils wasted millions of £ on over the years that are on nearly every corner. Also the roads are very small and the obsession with round a bouts. These all contribute to increases in risk.
 
I'm so glad I don't live in or close to a major city so I can cycle in relative safety compared to those who do.

Drivers round here more often than not give me right of way and are quite compassionate rather than the other attitude in built up areas where cyclists are considered vermin and inferior. I signal clearly, I'm always making progress and if I feel I'm holding a vehicle up I will make sure I'm not doing it for long if I can help it.
 
In london I think the biggest issues with cycle safety is those terrible black fences that the councils wasted millions of £ on over the years that are on nearly every corner. Also the roads are very small and the obsession with round a bouts. These all contribute to increases in risk.

Do you have an example of one of these "black fences" as I don't recall seeing one?
 
I'm so glad I don't live in or close to a major city so I can cycle in relative safety compared to those who do.

I cycle in rural Warwickshire and I experience that too. Edit - as in I experience courteous car drivers and relatively safe roads.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom