But it's then a running cost, not an upfront cost.And cost per year, isn't all zero.
Like fuel.
But it's then a running cost, not an upfront cost.And cost per year, isn't all zero.
But it's then a running cost, not an upfront cost.
Like fuel.
Becuase you said upfront cost...Not really. One is known. The other isn't. As I've said all the way through the thread. Not sure why you solely focused on initial cost.
Not in all posts.
VED in the following years is a cost spead over a long time.However saying that it's a fairly easy way to encourage us, to buy more economical vehicles. With a upfront price people think about, rather than costs spread over a long time, which people generally do not give much thought to.
VED as it stands at the moment is ineffective at what it is meant to do. The people that do care about the environment will buy green regardless, those that are on a budget don't actually have any real choice as they'll end up with a low VED car regardless. And VED in the whole is way too low to influence the rest of the buying public.VED needs to be taken as a whole. Initial year values further expands VED potency to help acheive governments aims. As well as laws, cost of petrol and many other schemes.
And shows just how good a tool this is for encouraging people to buy low-emission vehicles.
[TW]Fox;21294672 said:And then allowing them to emit shedloads of CO2 by driving them for 30,000 miles a year with foot flat to the floor everywhere instead of rationalising vehicle use....
I'm not complaining that my road tax is 7 times more expensive than a rep doing 30k a year in a similar sized smaller engined BMW. I'm saying that perhaps his should be more expensive, not that mine should be cheaperActually I'm not really complaining at all, I just thought this would spark an interesting debate
Isn't it better to encourage people to drive less? I use a mixture of my car and public transport for my travel. Isn't this what the government wants to encourage - a better transport mix? Yet I pay more in road tax than somebody who drives many thousands more miles than me and never uses the train...
The whole emissions excuse is just a scape-goat. When the day comes (and it will) where car companies start selling £10,000 electric cars that do 500 miles on a single charge, what's going to happen then? Ok a tax disc for an electric car is free now but it will all change when people start migrating to electric in big numbers. This could be 5 years or it could be 25 years but it will happen. You will still have to pay something somehow. The government need hard cash that's all there is to it.
Did you know there is tax on fuel as well?
Did you know there is tax on fuel as well?
When electric takes over, it will still be based on efficiency as more efficacy fleet is.
[TW]Fox;21294921 said:Gosh is there really? Well stop the press.
The whole emissions excuse is just a scape-goat. When the day comes (and it will) where car companies start selling £10,000 electric cars that do 500 miles on a single charge, what's going to happen then? Ok a tax disc for an electric car is free now but it will all change when people start migrating to electric in big numbers. This could be 5 years or it could be 25 years but it will happen. You will still have to pay something somehow. The government need hard cash that's all there is to it.
A subscription fee in order to be allowed to use public charge points, which also subsequently charge you for the electricity you use![]()