Cassie's law e-petition

Soldato
Joined
3 Aug 2003
Posts
15,921
Location
UK
This popped into my timeline on twitter earlier and I thought I'd take a look.
Looks on the face of it a sound idea.
What are your thoughts?

We would like to call on the Government to change the law so that the police have the power to temporarily suspend the driving licences of motorists whom they feel are unfit to drive.

Oh god, it's a daily fail link, bear with me...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-girl-killed-pensioner-lost-control-car.html

Whilst walking along Head street in the town past H&M, an out of control car mounted the pavement and struck Cassie, crushing her between it and the shop wall. The following day, the teenager was to succumb to her injuries and died in Queens Hospital with her family by her bedside.

But what of the driver? Was he drunk? No. Was he a young lad who had passed his test and was showing off like much of the media loves to tell us about? No. Or was he involved in a police chase and lost control in his desperate bid to escape? No. The driver was an 87 year old pensioner. So maybe just a tragic accident you might be thinking. Well maybe. But what makes this story so terrible is that just 3 days prior to this tragic event, Police were called to a collision in which a driver had crashed into a petrol pump on a forecourt endangering many people. The driver in question was the very same driver involved in Cassie’s death.

After the petrol station incident, the driver had failed an eye test and had to be driven home. Police had urged him not to get behind the wheel of his car again, but as the law stands, were powerless to immediately suspend his driving license. Unfortunately, the driver selfishly ignored the police’s advice and continued to drive despite his poor driving ability and eyesight. This was a selfish decision that claimed the life of an innocent victim with a long life full of potential ahead of her.

Now, Cassie’s mother, Jackie McCord has started a petition to push for a change in the law to give police the power to immediately suspend the licences of drivers who’s ability behind the wheel falls below an acceptable standard until a full medical examination can be held to confirm their ability to drive. This campaign is fully supported by Essex Police and like all petitions, needs 100,000 signatures before a debate can be heard in the House of Commons.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/21244


Got the backing of the police by the looks of it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-17245130

Ch Insp Richard Phillibrown said: "What we would like is the ability to suspend a licence, not remove it, pending a review of the facts by a court.

"I feel passionately that this will improve road safety across the country and I would only advocate that everyone looks at the petition, considers it and signs it."
 
Last edited:
This is a very sad story, a tradgey. I think it's to easy to read a sad story, get taken in (obviously I'm not questions it's validity) and sign a petition, there's always to sides to an argument and I'd be worried this would get misused.
 
If it is used for medical reasons like the case stated, then yes, they should be given the power, as the pensioner had clearly failed in his duty to suspend his own licence.

Giving them blanket powers however, would be dangerous.
 
Hence the post here for a little debate before I sign it in case there's an angle I've not really considered.
My very first thought was "how would this be abused"
 
Yes, Police should have power in such cut and dry circumstances to revoke a licence.

HOWEVER.

Nothing would have stopped this pensioner getting into his car and driving without it.

So what does this actually fix? If someone is happy to drive while being unfit to do so what makes you think they will not because they had their licence revoked?
 
Yes, Police should have power in such cut and dry circumstances to revoke a licence.

HOWEVER.

Nothing would have stopped this pensioner getting into his car and driving without it.

So what does this actually fix? If someone is happy to drive while being unfit to do so what makes you think they will not because they had their licence revoked?

This is my thought.

He'd crashed days earlier and told not to drive by the police already.

Suspending his license would have made no difference
 
Not sure what the problem with that is? Don't be a muppet in a carpark?

Because they are acting as judge and jury on a subjective issue compared with a situation which is cut and dried.

Additionally, it is off the road so in the strictest sense they don't have the power to "prosecute".
 
Not sure what the problem with that is? Don't be a muppet in a carpark?

Plenty of people who might mess about a bit as youths in a carpark without actually endangering anyone...

I don't think its a bad idea however it shouldn't rest in the hands of individual officers... i.e. police man stops someone and they give them a little bit of attitude so the police officer thinks "hmmm gonna teach this guy a lesson" suspends license for 2 months... guy loses job.

IMO there should be someone with the power to temporary suspend licenses at the police however that people like this can be reffered to i.e. a senior officer who can review the details of an incident as needed and apply temporary bans pending a full court application.
 
Because they are acting as judge and jury on a subjective issue compared with a situation which is cut and dried.

Additionally, it is off the road so in the strictest sense they don't have the power to "prosecute".

Not always true. Some supermarkets carparks are on land owned by the council and as such as considered public highway.

One of the Asda's near me is such a case.
 
This is my thought.

He'd crashed days earlier and told not to drive by the police already.

Suspending his license would have made no difference
Indeed.

Although in this case, whilst not a preventative measure, if what you've said is true, then this should sort of offence should carry a weighty penalty. The man was told not to drive by the police yet did so and proceeded to kill someone.

As well as that, I know very few people at that age who I would consider being safe in the car with. Certain relatives of mine are now crossing into their 7th decade, and one of them (the worse driver of the two) is adamant that they should keep his licence forever whilst the other (far better driver) is pretty sure they'll give theirs up within 5 years...
 
I just think that pensioners require a yearly retest.
Not a full test, but just drive through a city centre with an examiner to prove they are competent.

The average Policeman/Policewomen is not the cleverest and they are in no position to use their opinion on something.
 
I just think that pensioners require a yearly retest.
Not a full test, but just drive through a city centre with an examiner to prove they are competent.

The average Policeman/Policewomen is not the cleverest and they are in no position to use their opinion on something.

I've long argued that when OAPs are required to re apply for their license they should be required to undergo an examination of some sort.

It's every 5 years currently and they just sign themselves off as still fit to drive regardless I'd wheTher they can or not because they see driving as some kind of right.

Most people that age never passed a proper test anyway
 
Back
Top Bottom