The tolerant Catholic Church

Again, I agree with Rob, not helpful, People believe that church and religion give them a reason to live
 
How can it not be a choice?! you either choose to like **** or not. It is not built into peoples brains, if it was then you could argue that pedos have it built into them

Are you saying you have the urge to be with guys and children only you choose ignore it?

lol.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases#Criticisms_of_church_responses

The Church has considered protecting its image and clergy more important than protecting children.

You seem to be confusing the Church and individuals within the Church.

Just because a small percentage of priests have been guilty of abuse doesn't mean they all were. I have read figures as low as 0.12% of clergy (when using convictions) and as high as 6% (using all accusations and including consensual adult relationships)

Even using the highest figures still means that 19 out of every 20 priests had no involvement in any abuse.

This thread isn't even related to abuse and yet still a number of posters have felt the need to come out with their own ignorant and hate filled comments. Pure bigotry.
 
Are you saying you have the urge to be with guys and children only you choose ignore it?

lol.

Lol no not at all, I'm saying that as a straight guy, I have never had any urges towards men (or kids for that matter) but if suddenly I woke up and decided I wanted dick, how can anybody claim that is just years of denial?
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17249099



There are so many things wrong with what he has said I am not sure where to start, the outdated notion that only a man and a woman can be parents. Also the comment about an "accepted human right" what is he saying, homosexuals and lesbians forgo their human rights?

And lets be honest, the actions of some Priests and others who have tried to cover up their actions have brought not just shame but real pain and suffering to many.

If you read the full article it just gets worse.

even more ironic that the pope has actively covered up so many occurances of male priests abusing young boys. i guess its ok for a man and a boy but not a man and a man?

the sooner religion dies off the better, IMO.

** Post has been edited, please refrain from posting comments that others may find offensive.. Whether you agree or not, show some repect ***
 
If it was meant to be, then trust me, it would be possible by nature. Since it's NOT possible outside then you have to sit back and think why. For starters. A child needs his mother. Two women would be better and strange as it is, certainly better than two fathers, who are probably more interested in nancying around in tight clothing at gay clubs than being a responsible father.

Its a definate no go... The kids will grow up weird and confused.

This will be the start of the end if this ever became common practise.

you sound like you are fighting too hard to stay in the closet
 
The Catholic Church have said some outrageous things, but generally speaking, they're following the teachings of scripture that's over two thousand years old and therefore relatively outdated. Of the major Christian religions, I'd say they were perhaps the worst at adapting to the times. Let us not forget that Gay sex has been occurring throughout various monarchies, and emperors over the years in states that were Catholic. However, I imagine the Bishop (?) in the original article has to follow the stated party line. Not to mention same sex marriage is still a right which is lacking in most of the Western World (look at the states)....

The guys just following the party line. The fact that he's catholic means that there will be a larger amount of outrage at the fact that he's said it, however we don't have one of these posts every time an American politician with influence says the same thing, because ultimately people don't care so much and just dismiss it as an idiotic politician.

kd
 
The response to this is just another example of the general hate campaign against any form of religion. The sooner the UK loses it's Christian country tag the better. The UK is nothing of the sort. I can see with all this equal rights nonsense that the values of the country are going down the pot.

If somebody wants to be a poofter it is none of my business regardless of how I feel about it.

I am totally against the thought of gays being parents. It is totally wrong in my opinion and a father and mother bring a perfect balance. It is nature after all... if everyone evolved to be gays then that would be the end of reproduction and new generations.

Just think of the abuse a kid would get at school... "What does your mum do?"... Er, actually I don't have one. Absolutely shocking and I'd pity anyone born into such circumstances.

As mentioned above there are lots of rubbish parents who provide an awful environment for their kids to be born into. That is a separate issue but it certainly is as harmful.

i agree the kid would most likely get bullied. but then dont we have to change the perceptions of children (and the parent that gave them such BS in the first place)

my best mate is 'a gay'. him and his partner would both make excellent parent and in fact he is coming up to stay with us for a bit soon to help look after our nipper and let the wife get some more sleep :)

i feel for him as he will never really know what being a father is all about and he idolises my son.
 
Well I meant me, I was referring to myself, having never had any interest in men, I consider myself pretty straight, you saying I'm in denial about being gay?

haha no not at all.. I'm straight too and I've never had any feeling towards other men ,, but generally I think most gay people know that something isn't right, some even from a young age.

By the time they realise, they are old enough to know maybe being gay isn't something that will necessarily go down to well or even accepted. They go into deniel. Some are forthcoming, others aren't so. Ask yourself one question, your son tells you he is gay, how do respond?

I have a few gay friends who have told me that his was the case. I don't have a problem with them at all. They know i'm straight and they respect that. It's fine.
 
Lol no not at all, I'm saying that as a straight guy, I have never had any urges towards men (or kids for that matter) but if suddenly I woke up and decided I wanted ****, how can anybody claim that is just years of denial?

zero urges to men... yet being gay is a choice?

strong.
 
If it was meant to be, then trust me, it would be possible by nature.

That is not an argument against gay adoption. If fighting cancer was meant to be then it would be possible by nature, etc, etc...

Since it's NOT possible outside then you have to sit back and think why.

Biology.

Two women would be better and strange as it is, certainly better than two fathers, who are probably more interested in nancying around in tight clothing at gay clubs than being a responsible father.

LOL.

Its a definate no go... The kids will grow up weird and confused.

Do you have any evidence to backup your claim?
 
You got married in a church didn't you? by a Priest? in which case God had something to do with it. Oh and Civil Partnership is different to Marriage, I think thats what their issue is, they want to be considered as normal as possible by removing "Civil Partnership" and simply referring to it as marriage, I think anyways

me and my wife got married in a castle... **** removed *** . we both are atheists so a church wedding seemed a stupid idea.
 
Can’t really see the issue here, if the Catholic Church is against same sex marriage that’s their prerogative. You can’t force people to change their views or silence their voices just because you disagree with them. The Church is well within its rights to speak up in what it believes in.

Personally I’m against same sex marriage as in my opinion marriage should be between a man and a woman, a civil partnership should suffice. Nothing against gay people, hope they are happy but if some are uneasy about it they should be free to do so.

On the adopting side I’m strongly against gay couples adopting children as the child needs a mother and father figure in their life. The argument for “what about single mothers, fathers” is just ridicules as is due to some misfortune or another, hence being described as an unfortunate / un-ideal situation. Purposely placing a child into this “unfortunate” situation is wrong.

Again personally, I find homosexuality unnatural and in truth I find it dis-pleasurable viewing homosexual intimacy, but that’s probably more to do with upbringing than anything else. You often hear people counteracting the unnatural claim by pointing out “flying in aeroplanes is unnatural” or “your PC not made from a tree” etc and again this argument is ludicrous at best.
 
me and my wife got married in a castle... *** we both are atheists so a church wedding seemed a stupid idea.

Now that i agree with. I don't understand atheists who deliberatly get married in church weddings. A couple-friend of ours are getting married in a few months at a church and were telling us all about how to snickered through the meeting with the vicar. Erm, just get married somewhere else?
 
Well at least you make an effort to look at what it actually says unlike most on here who simple say, 'lolreligion', 'lol fairy tales', 'lol Jesus', 'lol bible bashers', 'lets abolish religion and the world would be better'. The same people who are banging on like this are the same people who call religious people bigots, and yet in the same paragraph demand that religion is abolished. You would think that might notice even a few 'particles' of hypocrisy.

well, religion has worked out so well in NI hasnt it?
 
thedoc46 said:
What exactly is homosexuality ? It's certainly not normal is it.

This is kind of the small minded uneducated response I'd expect from a homophobic who doesn't quite see that everyone is different and from which society could really do without. I don't blame anyone for being homophobic. Most fears are driven by something they don't understand.
 
Back
Top Bottom