680 BF3 Review @ 5760x1080p(3 screens)

EL_NEO · 27 Mar 2012 at 21:44

http://pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-C...ics-Card-Review-Kepler-Motion/Battlefield-3-0

sweet!!!!

Cleeecooo · 27 Mar 2012 at 21:45

EL_NEO said:
http://pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-C...ics-Card-Review-Kepler-Motion/Battlefield-3-0

sweet!!!!

Will be interesting to see if VRAM is holding it back at 5760x1080

olibb · 27 Mar 2012 at 21:55

VRAM

MissChief · 27 Mar 2012 at 21:58

But VRam doesn't seem to be an issue? There was little to no difference between the 2GB 680 and the 3GB 7970?

Stanners · 27 Mar 2012 at 22:01

olibb said:
VRAM

Eh ?

Am I reading it wrong, the 680 comes out on top even at high res(Just).

psychodil · 27 Mar 2012 at 22:02

Maybe the 680 scores are only on the middle screen, doesnt it give slower frame rates on the outside screens?

Stanners · 27 Mar 2012 at 22:04

Not Sure, I was confused by the Vram statement.

Gregster · 27 Mar 2012 at 22:09

That is pretty impressive tbf. I felt the 2GB of ram would fall short and cause stuttering/slideshow results.

Nothing in it between the 680 and 7970 as I see it.

baldmonk · 27 Mar 2012 at 22:15

vram ??

Stanners · 27 Mar 2012 at 22:21

baldmonk said:
vram ??

Sigh, Are we not talking about the BF3 results. You know as in the title of the thread (That is metro you know, they are different games and results)

Nightglow · 27 Mar 2012 at 22:22

gregster said:
Nothing in it between the 680 and 7970 as I see it.

I noticed that pcper used the latest driver for the GTX 680 a pre-release version of the 300.99 driver. :eek:

And Catalyst 12.2 for the 7970, wonder if the results would have been different with the Catalyst 12.4 beta, which are very very good.

Gregster · 27 Mar 2012 at 22:36

Nightglow said:
I noticed that pcper used the latest driver for the GTX 680 a pre-release version of the 300.99 driver.

And Catalyst 12.2 for the 7970, wonder if the results would have been different with the Catalyst 12.4 beta, which are very very good.

Yep. They came up with the goods this time on the drivers. AMD did done good

EL_NEO · 27 Mar 2012 at 23:14

card is looking better by the day imo

Gregster · 27 Mar 2012 at 23:26

EL_NEO said:
card is looking better by the day imo

Yep and nice BF3 stats btw

My kill/death ratio is horrendous. I run in like a headless chicken.

raralis · 28 Mar 2012 at 00:20

Anyone else notice how the min fps at 5760x1080 is higher than 2560x1600 even though it's has almost 50% more pixels to render?

Avg fps is almost the same as well.

Wonder if it's a driver issue or something.

dave_beast · 28 Mar 2012 at 01:07

Nightglow said:
I noticed that pcper used the latest driver for the GTX 680 a pre-release version of the 300.99 driver.

And Catalyst 12.2 for the 7970, wonder if the results would have been different with the Catalyst 12.4 beta, which are very very good.

I didn't even bother with 12.2 drivers, i'd rather **** in my hands and clap. 12.4 is where it's at, but I doubt we'll see any online reviewers using them

One · 28 Mar 2012 at 01:22

How come they all top out at 55fps on the big res?

Nightglow · 28 Mar 2012 at 08:10

desires said:
How come they all top out at 55fps on the big res?

That's what I wondered, would like to see more reviews at 5760x1080 & 2560x1600 before making judgment.

EL_NEO · 28 Mar 2012 at 09:16

gregster said:
Yep and nice BF3 stats btw My kill/death ratio is horrendous. I run in like a headless chicken.

Thx dude.