Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
A low end Llano or Intel Pentium or Celeron would do the job IMHO. Plonk in an SSD such as a Crucial M4 and it should fly along for most office tasks IMHO!!
Perhaps,you should look at a mini-ITX based computer or a Shuttle??
You sure a low end intel will be enough?
Yeah was thinking about a ssd, but the problem with ssd and a not to hot user, is they they will put all of there stuff on it, instead of the storage drive. Can you make windows put docs and pics in a different default location?
I never thought about a shuttle, I was thinking about buying a mini case and a m-atx/m-itx board?
Actually you can even go one step lower than the Pentium G620 and go for the £30~32 Celeron G530. According to review it is roughly on par with the good old Core2Duo E8400, but with even lower power consumption. Granted it won't be able to overclock like the E8400 does, but I don't think people would be overclocking the CPU for an office PC anyway.You sure a low end intel will be enough?
Isn't the i3 basically is on the same level as the old Core2Duo, as the i3 is a duel core?
Actually on gaming performance, the i3 2100 is even faster than the Core2Quad Q6600 overclocked to 3.6GHz, so for general task and application, it would be quite a bit faster as well (especially considering most general applications don't even use more than 2 cores). But if you were to talking about computer responsiveness rather than processing power, then there's no CPU or ram upgrade would make anywhere nearly as much as upgrading to SSD.Isn't the i3 basically is on the same level as the old Core2Duo, as the i3 is a duel core?
If it's purely just for office work, then even the Pentium with the integrated GPU is enough. Will he be doing anything else on the PC that might be more demanding?
Actually on gaming performance, the i3 2100 is even faster than the Core2Quad Q6600 overclocked to 3.6GHz, so for general task and application, it would be quite a bit faster as well (especially considering most general applications don't even use more than 2 cores). But if you were to talking about computer responsiveness rather than processing power, then there's no CPU or ram upgrade would make anywhere nearly as much as upgrading to SSD.
He says he wont be gaming, so its just for storing photos, internet and general office work.
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=FS-308-OK&groupid=43&catid=1798&subcat=
for an office machine,
unless he wants to join a domain then W7 Pro instead of W7 HP
for business dont cobble random components together buy a package, your friend will not thank you if he ends up with a machine that blue screens one a week...
Because in his religion he believes anyone that don't buy a pre-built PC from retailer and dares to attempt to build their own PC will end with tragic resultsWhy would it blue screen?
Because in his religion he believes anyone that don't buy a pre-built PC from retailer and dares to attempt to build their own PC will end with tragic results![]()
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=FS-308-OK&groupid=43&catid=1798&subcat=
for an office machine,
unless he wants to join a domain then W7 Pro instead of W7 HP
for business dont cobble random components together buy a package, your friend will not thank you if he ends up with a machine that blue screens one a week...