Yes, It's another Jaffa_Far thread, your favourite.
So, I watched 2012 the other night, and it makes NO SENSE at all. I did science at college but failed. I have an understanding of physics and chemistry, but not biology.
So, in the film, as you may know, its about the end of the world in 2012. There is NO explanation at all in the film as to why it is the end, except 2 lines right near the very beginning. An Indian scientist says, and I quote, "It looks like the neutrinos coming from the sun have mutated into a new kind of nuclear particle. They're heating up the earth's core and suddenly act like microwaves." Now, even with my very basic knowledge of science, and physics as a whole, this is impossible. As to the best of my knowledge, a particle itself cannot mutate into a nuclear particle, as it is not a living thing.
Now, what I would like to know is, am I right in this thought or is it entirely possible for a neutrino to mutate and turn nuclear?
So, I watched 2012 the other night, and it makes NO SENSE at all. I did science at college but failed. I have an understanding of physics and chemistry, but not biology.
So, in the film, as you may know, its about the end of the world in 2012. There is NO explanation at all in the film as to why it is the end, except 2 lines right near the very beginning. An Indian scientist says, and I quote, "It looks like the neutrinos coming from the sun have mutated into a new kind of nuclear particle. They're heating up the earth's core and suddenly act like microwaves." Now, even with my very basic knowledge of science, and physics as a whole, this is impossible. As to the best of my knowledge, a particle itself cannot mutate into a nuclear particle, as it is not a living thing.
Now, what I would like to know is, am I right in this thought or is it entirely possible for a neutrino to mutate and turn nuclear?