• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

ENGTX580 DCII/2DIS/1536MD5 - Sli Question

Associate
Joined
18 Feb 2010
Posts
7
Hi Folks,

Already own one of these above cards running on an Asus Rampage 2 motherboard. If I purchased another one it would only be able to fit in the 3rd PCI-E slot, assuming this would be ok?

Also would it allow me to run 3 screens for gaming?

Thanks for your time,
Matt
 
Go and look at the manual for your board regarding it fitting and working. Look at the bandwidth distro.

As for surround? yes you can do it with 580 SLI.
 
Go and look at the manual for your board regarding it fitting and working. Look at the bandwidth distro.

As for surround? yes you can do it with 580 SLI.

Hi ALXAndy, thanks for responding, being a bit noob as I am, so you know what things I need to check for as I've never used SLI before so not sure what I need to check for?

Cheers,
Matt
 
Ok looks like ideally I need to put a dual SLI config in PCIe slots 1 and 2, but since my card is a triple slot it covers PCIe slot2. Looks like if I put the second card in PCIe slot 3 it will only run at x1 which I am guessing will suck..

It suggests a can manually reassign link width in my bios, is this how to get around being only able to use PCIe slot 3?
 
Would a dual 580 not out do a single 680?

Yes. But, you are vram limited. Well, not as this post goes to press, but give it time. Speed of the GPUs won't count.

BF3 has been shown and proven to use upward of 1.5gb. Now obviously it doesn't go upward enough to hurt performance on a 1.5gb card but it does on a 1.2gb card.

We've irrefutably proven this as fact over the past three days. Even Nvidia themselves confirm it.

So do you think it's wise to invest £250 or more into this technology that could end up falling on its face with the next big PC title?

Or, would you rather sell the one you have for £200, put the same £250 up and buy a card that is a lot more future proof?

Some don't worry too much about vram. Some buy cards based on their overall speed and ignore most of everything else.

That's fine if you don't mind spending another £400+ in a year's time because your card happens to fall short on something as crucial as vram.

I own a 7970. It was a complete waste of money. However, given the chance do to it again? well, the chance doesn't come up often for me to be able to waste so much money, but given the chance again even now with the 680 out I would buy a 7950.

It has everything you could possibly need.

It's very very rare for me to buy a PC part based on what I want. It's usually what I need.

And a 7950 in any game at 1080p has more than enough ability to deliver what you need it to.

Mind you, at 1080p so does the 580. So the smart solution is to wait until it no longer does, THEN spend money.

Adding to it won't help matters much, and I don't care how badly I get shot in flames for this, surround with 1.5gb is pushing it. You will not be maxing out BF3.

I guess it depends. If you want to spend some money for the sake of it? not for me to judge.
 
Yes. But, you are vram limited. Well, not as this post goes to press, but give it time. Speed of the GPUs won't count.

BF3 has been shown and proven to use upward of 1.5gb. Now obviously it doesn't go upward enough to hurt performance on a 1.5gb card but it does on a 1.2gb card.

We've irrefutably proven this as fact over the past three days. Even Nvidia themselves confirm it.

So do you think it's wise to invest £250 or more into this technology that could end up falling on its face with the next big PC title?

Or, would you rather sell the one you have for £200, put the same £250 up and buy a card that is a lot more future proof?

Some don't worry too much about vram. Some buy cards based on their overall speed and ignore most of everything else.

That's fine if you don't mind spending another £400+ in a year's time because your card happens to fall short on something as crucial as vram.

I own a 7970. It was a complete waste of money. However, given the chance do to it again? well, the chance doesn't come up often for me to be able to waste so much money, but given the chance again even now with the 680 out I would buy a 7950.

It has everything you could possibly need.

It's very very rare for me to buy a PC part based on what I want. It's usually what I need.

And a 7950 in any game at 1080p has more than enough ability to deliver what you need it to.

Mind you, at 1080p so does the 580. So the smart solution is to wait until it no longer does, THEN spend money.

Adding to it won't help matters much, and I don't care how badly I get shot in flames for this, surround with 1.5gb is pushing it. You will not be maxing out BF3.

I guess it depends. If you want to spend some money for the sake of it? not for me to judge.

Thanks for the frank thoughts, I hate wasting money on something that doesn't last but equally hate blowing money when I won't see the advantage of buying bleeding edge.

I know I want to have surround gaming "IF it works", I've been following the threads on VRAM limits quite heated I've seen.

Again thanks for your time on the matter.

Regards,
Matt
 
Back
Top Bottom