Promiscuous girls/women

I could never have a relationship with a girl like this. It's fine to just have fun with, but for relationship material it's too much (sloppy seconds etc!)

I mean, girlfriend material doesn't have to be a virgin! Just that if they count their sexual partners in centuries like a cricket score it's no deal!

Some of the attitudes around are hilarious, for one thing a women that has slept with say 30 guys is MOST LIKELY having a bunch of one night stands, that is, say over 10 or 20 years, or you know, 3500 to 7000 days roughly having sex not that often, could be as few as 30 times.

While a person who is dating one serious partner for a decade might be doing it 10 times a week, for a decade could have had sex, and likely far more intimate(yes the other hole), filthy, experimental, kinky sex, errm, basically thousands of times.

So what is it that people don't like, is it how sloppy they are, or the number of guys, or the type of sex they had or what.

People have sex, women frequently lie about the amount of partners they have(as do guys, we lie with a higher number to friends and a lower number to girlfriends) because we have this mental idea, with no logic behind it, that having had more sex is somehow a bad thing. Though realistically most people even more illogically relate the number of people to more sex, when the opposite is usually true and less partners generally means more relationship which generally means more sex.


Its not even a victorian attitude, because up until really early/mid 1900's, people were far more open about sex, and didn't give a **** about it.


Women are absolutely free to have fun, sex isn't dirty, or filthy(unless you want it to be) and if you judge someone on how much sex they've had, its a FAR bigger statement on the people who think its weird than the people who have a normal healthy sex life.

You are absolutely entitled to want to be with a virgin and never sleep with anyone else in your life time, and you can find women who have lots of sex odd. But you should also realise that there is little to no logic behind most peoples "beliefs" on it. Parents/society gives you the idea sex is naughty, shouldn't be talked about and that anyone that does it a lot is weird, without ever explaining why.


Either way, while men often have this attitude women will continue to lie about their number, the OP/Pate, have this idea that women should be all but celibate, so women play up to that role. They lie because ultimately deep down you want it to be true and in real life its easier for women to pretend to be what you want, than you fix your attitude.

Whatever, I'll marry some women eventually who is absolutely fantastic in bed, and the OP/Pate and anyone else can marry a virgin, who turns out to be awful in bed, and regret it for life.
 
There's your problem. Get a girl that doesn't do missionary ;)

Are you a religious man Pate?

Haha, I'm sure my potential future partner and me can make up and find the 1001 different ways.

And yes, I'm Catholic. :)

Lying after five months in a relationship about something as fundamental as that? Dude was waiing for marriage, the girl gas revolving door instead of flaps, best they separate.

Thanks for seeing the issue.
 
However it's not me. I personally believe that sex signifies more than just some fun, it's a step taken with someone really special.
You should consider whether this would be fair on your would-be partner. You'll be putting a lot of pressure on her to make it a magical experience, which it won't be. It's going to be horrible, awkward, virgin sex.

Also, refusing to date women who have slept with more than a few men is inherently judgemental. What a woman has done with other men doesn't affect her 'worth' and isn't any of your business. The only thing that matters is her faithfulness to you.

Lying after five months in a relationship about something as fundamental as that? Dude was waiing for marriage, the girl gas revolving door instead of flaps, best they separate.
Did she cheat on him? This is misogynist BS.
 
Ah yes, God bless virgin sex :lol:

Women say it's painful, and men usually get within a mm of a ladies thigh before covering her/your undercrackers/insert as applicable in years of frustrated repression.

Is anything as over-rated?
 
Because I would want sex with myself and a particular person to be something we had just experienced ourselves, rather than with someone who's watched the ceiling more times than I've had hot meals..

you do realise as DM says if she'd only been with one bloke for say 4 years before she met you she will have been railed far more than the one night stand girl.
 
Ah yes, God bless virgin sex :lol:

Women say it's painful, and men usually get within a mm of a ladies thigh before covering her/your undercrackers/insert as applicable in years of frustrated repression.

Is anything as over-rated?

don't think i've spoken to one bloke who didn't describe at as a terrible experience :p
 
Only because she knew he'd spack out, because he has ridiculously 'traditional' views. He forced her into the corner. Obviously lying is never the best way forward, but he kinda pushed her into doing so, imo.

So wait, you're saying that because I've got certain viewpoints that you deem "traditional" the fault is mine?

Basically it's the same as you going out with a girl, not seeing eye to eye on a serious issue but her lying about it to stay with you. Are you saying it's acceptable to do on any issue?

There are different types of people for different types of people. There are girls in the world (especially other Catholics) who agree with my viewpoint and would be just as demanding in this respect.



You should consider whether this would be fair on your would-be partner. You'll be putting a lot of pressure on her to make it a magical experience, which it won't be. It's going to be horrible, awkward, virgin sex.

Also, refusing to date women who have slept with more than a few men is inherently judgemental. What a woman has done with other men doesn't affect her 'worth' and isn't any of your business. The only thing that matters is her faithfulness to you.


Did she cheat on him? This is misogynist BS.

I've already said that my first time is likey to be pretty **** due to my inexperience, so I don't know where on Earth you're inferring that I said I'd be expecting my partner to be "brilliant". Anyone with half a brain cell would see that there's a learning curve. The difference is that we'd have 50 years to explore it together.

As for me being judgemental, I've REPEATEDLY said that I don't see the issue with it, people can do what they want, it's just not my cup of tea.

So please stop with negative attitude to me.

P.s How am I being mysognist?
 
I particularly dislike your inability and flat refusal to compromise in a relationship, Pate. You're stating that your view and desires are the only things that matter and sod what the girl has done or thinks about sex. It's extremely distasteful at best.
 
drunkenmaster and Tefal swooping in here and talking total sense. One long relationship generally means more, and more kinky weird, sex than a string of one night stands...and the sex get better so she will be expecting more.

don't think i've spoken to one bloke who didn't describe at as a terrible experience :p

It wasnt a terrible experience it was terrible sex but was very funny, both of us just laughed the whole way through :D
 
Never thought I would see the day where a thread appears in a forum for geeks (lets be honest) complaining about how girls are TOO easy!!!
 
I particularly dislike your inability and flat refusal to compromise in a relationship, Pate. You're stating that your view and desires are the only things that matter and sod what the girl has done or thinks about sex. It's extremely distasteful at best.

I'm extremely lax on most things in life. If you knew me (and lets not start with the presumptions again, lets not have a repeat of Castiels wife rebuking you :p) you've agree.

However there are a few issues that yes ARE important to me. Is that so very wrong? If there is an issue then it's something me and a person can work through or not. I'm assuming we all have principles we hold true to?

The whole sex business is a state of mind. Someone on a completely different wavelength is not going to be compatible with me, just like I'm sure you can think of issues that some people wouldn't be compatible with you on. It's the way of the world.




Referring to the fact of how many people's she been with, and the implications therefore, rather than the actual act.
 
No, I'm saying your obvious refusal to compromise/accept people like sex arguably forced her to lie (or she felt it was necessary to do so). As it was a lie with wholly good intentions (she liked you, wanted to stay with you, and didn't want her past to put a kibosh on the relationship), I find it hard to say she was wholly to blame. It's not as though she was lying in the sense of concealing an affair, or whatever.

So you're saying that she clearly saw that I had an issue with it, and rather than accepting responsibility for her actions (which I'm going to state again are NOT wrong, just not mutually compatible with me) and coming clean and giving a RELATIONSHIP some honesty, thought it best to lie for her own gratification?
 
She obviously was compatible with you... whilst you didn't know she'd had numerous sexual partners, you got on fine. That demonstrates the above is incorrect.

Actually the whole reason I found out was due to differing opinions on the whole manner of sex, which lead to suspicions which lead to the revelations.

The fact of the matter is that she probably would not have been happy with me long term anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom