Apologies Dimple for critting you with the wall of text + 5!
I think GPs over-prescribe pretty much everything (I could have murdered some of them for antibiotic usage sometimes). But I feel in the time they have allocated to them with the resources they have available to them and with the variety of conditions they have to see then they have little choice but to do so sometimes. They would be damned if they did nothing. I do think medicating depression is a valid method of treatment for some people. I do not believe it is an absolute treatment though. I do believe the quality of GPs is highly variable - this we all know.
There is a problem that mental health has a lot of hangovers from "bad" (I mean lacking in an evidence base) practice going back to the whole mind-body duality thing. A tendency for practitioners traditionally to ignore the physical and genetic and overemphasise the environmental. Ironically then only treating the opposite way around.
Mental-health also suffers from the stigma associated with it and rather than challenge that practitioners have often found strength in that and promoted a strong political lobbying force. So there are lot of professional and scientific politics involved. This will have a knock on effect on patients, what is seen as valid treatment, what is even allowed to be researched etc. Thankfully this problem is decreasing. But care is compromised in patients with mental health problems due to unsound professional lobbying.
There is essentially a battle going on as we speak professionally between an old guard and a new guard shall we say - we even now have conditions that may have been labelled as mental health a few years back now falling under the remit of neuropsychiatry ie people are accepting the new ideas of the mechanics driving these conditions. Such a rapidly changing field is something no GP can get a hold on and therefore in the main I would expect most competent GPs would refer on now at the earliest opportunity and only instigate treatment themselves when they have a clear indication to. They have the name general for a reason. But then that is far from simple let me explain a bit further with an example;
Xordium: Hello Mr GP I am feeling a bit down - well to be honest I have been sleeping a lot lately very deeply not really moving you know when you wake up and well your arm is dead and you get pins and needles. I am not eating so well either and just getting angry with people. I am feeling really low but I don't know just don't seem to care just tired just want to lie down feel dizzy confused flat head just feels dull and my eyes all blurry. Just unhappy
Now what would you say to that - sounds depressed maybe I mean that may be your first thought. Unless you like neurology then maybe the pins and needles and the blurry eyes and dizziness would spring out at you and you'd think - stroke ... multiple sclerosis ... transient ischemic attack. How about if you like endocrine type stuff or renal then maybe you'd be thinking diabetes etc. And all the other types of doctor would draw something different out of that of those few words.
Now a poor GP has to guess the right route. But here is the kicker if that GP then refers on straight away what do you think all those other doctors will do - do you think the neuro chap will look at for diabetes or do you think he'll order an MRI straight away wasting resources and time to diagnosis.
So what we may have is a best case system.
I think GPs over-prescribe pretty much everything (I could have murdered some of them for antibiotic usage sometimes). But I feel in the time they have allocated to them with the resources they have available to them and with the variety of conditions they have to see then they have little choice but to do so sometimes. They would be damned if they did nothing. I do think medicating depression is a valid method of treatment for some people. I do not believe it is an absolute treatment though. I do believe the quality of GPs is highly variable - this we all know.
There is a problem that mental health has a lot of hangovers from "bad" (I mean lacking in an evidence base) practice going back to the whole mind-body duality thing. A tendency for practitioners traditionally to ignore the physical and genetic and overemphasise the environmental. Ironically then only treating the opposite way around.
Mental-health also suffers from the stigma associated with it and rather than challenge that practitioners have often found strength in that and promoted a strong political lobbying force. So there are lot of professional and scientific politics involved. This will have a knock on effect on patients, what is seen as valid treatment, what is even allowed to be researched etc. Thankfully this problem is decreasing. But care is compromised in patients with mental health problems due to unsound professional lobbying.
There is essentially a battle going on as we speak professionally between an old guard and a new guard shall we say - we even now have conditions that may have been labelled as mental health a few years back now falling under the remit of neuropsychiatry ie people are accepting the new ideas of the mechanics driving these conditions. Such a rapidly changing field is something no GP can get a hold on and therefore in the main I would expect most competent GPs would refer on now at the earliest opportunity and only instigate treatment themselves when they have a clear indication to. They have the name general for a reason. But then that is far from simple let me explain a bit further with an example;
Xordium: Hello Mr GP I am feeling a bit down - well to be honest I have been sleeping a lot lately very deeply not really moving you know when you wake up and well your arm is dead and you get pins and needles. I am not eating so well either and just getting angry with people. I am feeling really low but I don't know just don't seem to care just tired just want to lie down feel dizzy confused flat head just feels dull and my eyes all blurry. Just unhappy
Now what would you say to that - sounds depressed maybe I mean that may be your first thought. Unless you like neurology then maybe the pins and needles and the blurry eyes and dizziness would spring out at you and you'd think - stroke ... multiple sclerosis ... transient ischemic attack. How about if you like endocrine type stuff or renal then maybe you'd be thinking diabetes etc. And all the other types of doctor would draw something different out of that of those few words.
Now a poor GP has to guess the right route. But here is the kicker if that GP then refers on straight away what do you think all those other doctors will do - do you think the neuro chap will look at for diabetes or do you think he'll order an MRI straight away wasting resources and time to diagnosis.
So what we may have is a best case system.
Last edited: