Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I will take 2.
I will take 2.
Apparently it runs Crysis 2 on ultra at 60fps
For £800 i'd want one hell of a lot more than that!!
hows the power issue with this compared to the 590 what would just blow up for no reasson as such?...
hows the power issue with this compared to the 590 what would just blow up for no reasson as such?...
Nice looking card tho...
You have to be super rich or a lunatic. 'Investing' this sort of money in to a GPU only for a newer faster card to appear in less than 12 months must be gutting![]()
You have to be super rich or a lunatic. 'Investing' this sort of money in to a GPU only for a newer faster card to appear in less than 12 months must be gutting![]()
but the price is just crazy. The sweet spot is always the mid range cards, I'm really surprised Nvidia have released the 690 before any of them.
Well, my 590 runs crysis 2 on ultra at 60fps plus, so I wouldnt believe that
(1) Testing was conducting comparing the GeForce GTX 690 versus GTX 680, running at a resolution of 2,500 x 1,600. Driver version used was 301.10. In the Heaven benchmark, with 4xAA/16xAF settings, GTX 690 scored 58.9 fps while the GTX 680 scored 31.1 fps. For Crysis 2 Ultra, the GTX 690 scored 57.8 fps while the GTX 680 scored 32.3 fps. In Dirt 3, with 8xAA/16xAF, the GTX 690 scored 111.2 fps, while the GTX 680 scored 62.3 fps. For performance, a higher number is better.