Oh the ironing
What gun is more powerfull?
- Thread starter arekgreenman888
- Start date
Oh the ironing
Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2011
- Posts
- 1,655
Why would you think that? if it did hit the table it would have gone straight through with little resistance. (he made a little hole in the table)
thats why he uses props and c4, jazz it up abit like in the movies
Last edited:
Why would you think that? if it did hit the table it would have gone straight through with little resistance. (he made a little hole in the table)
thats why he uses props and c4, jazz it up abit like in the movies
It looks like one of those feeble chipboard efforts, just expected it to fall apart with that sized round hitting it.
Why would you think that? if it did hit the table it would have gone straight through with little resistance. (he made a little hole in the table)
thats why he uses props and c4, jazz it up abit like in the movies
Most things to do with firearms are jazzed up for the movies, with the possible exception of the damage that they can cause to a person. That bit is, if anything, under-played in some cases (but often over-played as well). Don't get me started on bullet hits sending people flying...
M
Nope, he makes thousands off a character he has created and has the chance to do things most people would never get to do.
The worst part about guns and movies is all the "trained" people that miss 99.9% of the time
that being said it is a movie and is only for entertainment, not a fact filled documentary loland what's wrong with bullets sending people flying? i guess that depends what you actually mean by that.
The worst part about guns and movies is all the "trained" people that miss 99.9% of the time
Well quite - you can just imagine the next Bond film, he'd be dead in the first 10 minutes
You mean like when people get shot in the leg and it always misses every major artery and they are completely fine after a few mins
. Or when they get shot in the stomach and die as soon as they hit the floor.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 1 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 12,681
- Location
- Tyneside
Aye. The movies have neat red holes as gunshot wounds but the reality is very different and more horrific.
I have to ask, where the hell do these internet people come from with their "I'm going to buy a gun for personal protection" from the US and which one fellow geeks is the best cuz you'll all know. Some real care in the community people posting threads on here of late, fantasists.
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 1,765
Thanks for good suggestions on s&w 500. It is a fantastic fire arm and i'll be supporting local economy also whilst in USA. Hit two birds with one stone. I am so good.
I'm talking about the idea, started (AFAIK) by Sam Peckinpah, that when someone is hit by any round bigger than .22 they go flying backwards. Or forwards if they were shot from behind. They don't. It doesn't matter what you hit them with, and at what range, they do not fly through the air. They're not even knocked over by the hit. If you hit them with a 9mm at point blank range they don't fly. 5.56mm at 10m - no. Saw-off 12-bore at 1m, still no. 20mm cannon shell at 100m, still no. The only way it could happen is if you are wearing VERY strong armour and the bullet is huge, but doesn't penetrate the armour. Then maybe you might get knocked over backwards. Otherwise, the reaction of a person to being shot is the same as a puppet that gets all its strings cut simultaneously.
M
Yep.
GSWs are pretty gruesome, especially from a L96 from a 1000yrds. Head?....what head?
It's only a flesh wound......
