Indeed. Seems a sensible move really.
Does the fact that tourists can smoke weed in cafe's have a massive impact on other tourists visiting for other reasons?
Indeed. Seems a sensible move really.
You made the statement that it's been proven to not be harmful. Can you evidence that?
The are two main reasons tourists go to Amsterdam, weed and hookers, mostly the weed.
Yes, I can just see it now - 100's of stag parties queuing up for the Rijksmuseum. "Theres only one Rembrandt, one Rembraaaaaandt..."![]()
Does the fact that tourists can smoke weed in cafe's have a massive impact on other tourists visiting for other reasons?
Weed ruins lives, too.
On the other hand, he could have had 56 MASSIVE plants, yielding a ridiculous amount of cannabis...
So now you've shifted from 'no harm', to 'the benefits outweigh the harm'...
And no one's denying the fact there can be medicinal uses, but you said it'd been proven to be harmless.
Meh, it's not hard to convince an ignorant judge of such things...Still, the CPS (I'm guessing, as we still haven't been furnished with a full source) proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he had enough to sell/was selling for profit/whatever.
Love all the cool kids with "dealers" at the touch of a button and defiantly smoking weed. Well jel.
Love all the cool kids with "dealers" at the touch of a button and defiantly smoking weed. Well jel.
It's ridiculous when the staunchly pro crowd completely deny ANY possibility of harm, and refuse to get into any productive dialogue...
It is amazingly easy to get drugs, scarily so!![]()
Was it crown court then? Meh, even worse, the general public are even more ignorant than the judges!The judge doesn't decide. The jury does...
Because I know that if he was his sentance would have been a LOT worse if that was the case. Plus I know that the ammount he would get off that in a small inside grow would be just enough to give the man an Ounce or two a week, which is just the right ammount for someone who is taking a lot of it to control pain.Why is it only legitimate to look at it from the perspective you are - that he's a poor innocent man, just growing for himself. Whilst it's illegitimate/COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE that he was growing substantial quantities for sale?
Still, the CPS (I'm guessing, as we still haven't been furnished with a full source) proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he had enough to sell/was selling for profit/whatever.