Actually it is.
If Redknapp gave youth a chance:
BAE would not have played as many games as he did, Rose would have been used there.
Only reason Sandro and Livermore have been used is when Lennon/Parker/VDV have been injured. and probably because Huddlestone is injured.
Europa league was a joke to Redknapp, didnt want to play any of our "good players" in it.
He gave us Saha and Nelsen.
It's unbelievable how Liverpool fans will use everything against him. What has Dalglish done for youth that Hodgson didn't, used Spearing and Shelvey more, did any of them watch either of those players this season, they made Poulson look positively good, no really, they are both horrendous players.
At Arsenal Wenger doesn't use some younger players he should, but most of them are just ****, 9/10 young players at every top club won't end up playing above league one, that is how football goes. Where is Chadwick now, and Bellion, and a dozen other guys who actually got a chance with utd, what about the other 100 that never even got a first team appearance.
Kelly is really the only youth player at Liverpool that looks worth a damn and, oh yes, Hodgson gave him European games(while actually not pretending the cup is an inconvenience like Redknapp) and his first league games.
I'd also like to know where else Hodgson has failed, he's won titles in countries with teams which were capable of winning titles, and he's done well elsewhere. WBA aren't capable of winning leagues, they were flirting with relegation without Hodgson, with Hodgson there wasn't a hint at any stage this season they might be relegated, and last year he took over a team struggling and again took them safe from relegation.
In Italy he was so well respected they asked him back as care taker manager for a second time.
Too many people equate not winning titles with, somehow, failure, people need to get a grip. Taking over WBA and failing to win the premier league is failure, or with Fulham. It wouldn't even slightly matter if he did fail a decade ago, managers learn over time, Fergie had plenty of bad seasons, as did Wenger, as did most managers, that's how you become a good manager, learning and improving. He did fantastically well with Fulham, built a team from scratch, a good team, a solid team, taught them to defend, got much more out of multiple players than most people thought was possible, and took them to a European final, yeah, horrific failure that he is.
what exactly was his failure at Inter, he took over a team that was doing very badly, took them up the table to 7th, got Uefa cup football, the following season he took them to the final but lost, and the year after that they won it(when he wasn't there) he was part of a rebuilding phase and his only "failure" was he didn't win the final, they also finished third in the table.
Where is this failure exactly? Oh he left, after finishing 3rd and getting to a final, the same way Mourinho is a failure because he was fired at Chelsea?
Blackburn finished 2 points above relegation before Hodgson joined,they failed to win any of their first 10 games the next season, he took over and got them to 6th despite the poor start, another massive massive failure for Hodgson. Yeah, he had a bad time the next season, but Blackburn were fighting relegation BEFORE he joined, he had one outstanding season and another back in their old form, having lost, iirc Shearer and Sutton and Hendry, and with Davies being the big buy, who failed spectacularly.