have not read your links, but what you said is BULL. IE6 was a travesty, which ms have been putting right ever since. the problem was the sheer number of IT departments in pragmatic organisations that extended the shelf life of IE6 beyond reason.
Anything that stops the spread of Internet Explorer is a good thing IMO.
However that ruling is pretty dumb.
Used wrongly it stifles competition. Pretty well understood now I think given the ongoing Samsung and Apple disputes.
Why is it banned in Germany and not other countries?
IE is actually decent now. its taken years though!
because germany is the only place with barnpots for judges.
Software patents are ridiculous. It's basically copyrighting maths.
One of the most ridiculous statements I have ever seen on here.
Why is it ridiculous? Have you seen what is patented, single lines of code have been patented before.
I don't see how a line of code can be justified to be patented. Coding is really just maths used creatively, where do you think logical statements came from? Such as OR & AND? You do understand that algorithms existed before computers?
Yes you don't have to know any maths but logic is a subset of maths and it's used heavily in coding.
The same principle can be applied to pretty much any patent. They all rely on the laws of physics which ties in with maths.
I know what you are saying but but you are abstracting far too much. At what point do you stop. Every literary work is simply a collection of words so how can you protect the order they are in?
Why is it banned in Germany and not other countries?
It's much different with code though, think how much work goes into a book and how much work goes into a line of code.
It's common sense anyway that you shouldn't copyright something that impedes on someone else who wants to do the same thing, which software patents do all the time. You couldn't copyright a sentence used all the time but you can do that with code for some reason.
Software patents are ridiculous. It's basically copyrighting maths.