The point still stands, cheap alternatives have been around for years yet Red Bull only get richer. Kick, Blue Bolt, Red Rooster, Emerge, Tiger, Charge etc etc all taste the exact same as Red Bull for a fraction of the cost.
.
A hypothesis can be wrong, a factual claim can be wrong. A subjective opinion can not be wrong by it's nature.
Woolworths used to be one of the UK's top retailers, HMV were the top dogs for selling CDs.
Woolworths used to be one of the UK's top retailers, HMV were the top dogs for selling CDs.
A subjective opinion can not be wrong by it's nature.
Why are you comparing stores that sold other peoples items to Red Bull?
Why were Red Bull buying up other peoples items?
??
Oh wait, you misunderstood?
Comparison is a store that sells other companies items v red bull.
Red Bull is one of the biggest brands in the world and is recognisable by almost everyone in a first world country. If you're unaware of what brand awareness means to a product, any product, you should probably check it out.
Red Bull could manufacture anything, they could make computers and still make millions more than you ever could no matter how good your components are or how much cheaper they are. Christ, you're asking the kind of question in the OP on a computer forum where there is a hugely over-hyped brand of computer that sells people the same components in a fancy case for 160-200% markup? Now imagine if Alienware was as well known as Red Bull and you have a fraction of the idea.
I take it you have shares in Red Bull then (or work for them). It was a simple question, you think they'll be alright and that's cool but you don't have to be so smarmy with your answer bud.
Red bull is a private company, it doesn't sell stock.
Never said it did, you can have a share based company without trading them on the stock market you know.