Student convicted of using a webcam to secretly film his room-mate in a gay encounter imprisoned

I wouldn't see this as a silly prank, it's disgusting. In fact given the problems gay people have in being accepted in society then I'd happily see this as a hate crime.

I don't want to share a planet with scum like this and all he got was 30 days?
Unbelievable :(


Would you apply the same harsh reasoning to children in the playground?

It's exactly the same thing... he was 20... most people still think of themselves as kids in to old age... it was a silly prank - how on earth does that deserve jail time?

I'll use the brothers comparison again...
 
Last edited:
So why do we call them our 'privates then....


Anyway, it does make sense, what I'm getting at is that a bad deed is still a bad deed even if it's legally okay.

A legal bad deed can not be convicted. You need to campaign for change of law if you feel something sould be illegal..


As for the privates thing, you must be a troll or ......

A silly prank that turns into manslaughter should not get sentenced? A prank does not obsolete you of responsibility and it's utterly stupid to think it should.
 
To a point, but the law doesn't see it that way. Where would you draw the line? Can I take pictures of strangers, what if they wander into a shot?

Would that be just as illegal as invasion of privacy, despite being in public?

I think that the intent should be evaluated.

Is it okay to goto a childs playground with the sole intent to take 'upskirt' shots of little girls?

Or is it okay because one is in a public place?

As for the privates thing, you must be a troll or ......

... a decent human being?



A legal bad deed can not be convicted.

Yeah. EXACTLY. :D
 
Last edited:
also you say only law that he broke?



says he broke 15 or a couple multiple times...





that's some pretty hefty law breaking to be fair.

I think that's what he got jail time for not the invasion of privacy.

Raikiri posted the descriptions of what these "infractions" were... please read them, they're a complete and utter joke like "editting a tweet".

They threw everything they could at him to try and make something stick because the other guy killed himself... it really is that simple. If the mentally unstable guy was still alive, it would never have come to this. His instability is not the responsibility of anyone else.
 
Would you apply the same harsh reasoning to children in the playground?

It's exactly the same thing... he was 20... most people still think of themselves as kids in to old age... it was a silly prank - how on earth does that deserve jail time?

Children are not legally responsible until, 16 is it?

He is an adult, although in this case he seems to have been treated with the same kid gloves that the British police reserve for Muslims.

Put yourself in the other guys shoes, a bully has a gay tape of you - that's one hell of a thing to hold over someone. This isn't some Tulsia thing gone wrong, it's a hate crime.

We appear to be polar opposites on this so maybe better to agree to disagree.
 
They threw everything they could at him to try and make something stick because the other guy killed himself... it really is that simple. If the mentally unstable guy was still alive, it would never have come to this. His instability is not the responsibility of anyone else.
Well, should one not take responsibility for poking the sad person with a stick? Surely one would know the possible reactions?
 
Some would I suppose, the destruction of evidence etc. But the three counts of 'bias intimidation' could still stand, even if the actions that led to them were legal.

It was actually 4... but please read what they actually are before making them sound worse than they really are:

COUNT 2: Bias intimidation on Sept. 19, 2010, for setting up the camera to watch Clementi with another man, a move that made Clementi feel intimidated. (3rd degree)
COUNT 4: Bias intimidation, for knowing his conduct could intimidate Clementi and make Clementi feel he was targeted because he was gay. (2nd degree)
COUNT 6: Bias intimidation for attempting to invade privacy with purpose to intimidate Clementi because of his sexual orientation. (3rd degree)
COUNT 8: Bias intimidation. For tweeting an invitation for people to watch Clementi's Sept. 21, 2010 visit with M.B., thereby causing Clementi to feel intimidated. (2nd degree)

Four seperate charges for that... it's completely ridiculous.

They abused process by throwing every possible charge they could at the guy in the hope that just 1 of them would stick. What he was charged with is clearly an abuse of the legal system...
 
Children are not legally responsible until, 16 is it?

He is an adult, although in this case he seems to have been treated with the same kid gloves that the British police reserve for Muslims.

Put yourself in the other guys shoes, a bully has a gay tape of you - that's one hell of a thing to hold over someone. This isn't some Tulsia thing gone wrong, it's a hate crime.

We appear to be polar opposites on this so maybe better to agree to disagree.

But from what I read, he didn't "hold it over him"... he just thought it was funny and shared it with a few people. The guy involved didn't find out til after the fact...

While, no, that doesn't make it much better... it goes to show how relatively innocent the prank was.
 
Well, should one not take responsibility for poking the sad person with a stick? Surely one would know the possible reactions?

In an ideal world, yes... but it isn't an ideal world.

Plus, you can never tell how someone is going to react to anything. I have a mal-formed empathy gland (;)) and relatively frequently "stick my foot in my mouth", hurting someones feelings along the way.

It's almost always just an attempt to be matter-of-fact, simply logic with no ******** getting in the way of the facts... too many people take offense to this kind of interaction... it's not like I'm shouting "GET THE HELL AWAY FROM ME!" at the top of my lungs in an open office...

Acts like this are commonplace, whether in public or private... while I've mentioned many times in this thread that I hate how the popular trends are leaning toward this behaviour... it can certainly be expected. That doesn't mean that it should be, but at this rate... things are only going to get worse. Prepare for it and it won't come as a shock... killing yourself for someone exposing your sexual orientation is retarded... but then I also appreciate his right to take his own life - everyone has that right... I've almost used that right, seeing how pointless this entire existence is... we're here to reproduce and turn in to dust, nothing more. Anyway, I digress too much about myself.

I wouldn't even call what the guy did bullying... it was just sillyness. People who break limbs for fun get away scott-free... yet someone who makes a silly video of two guys kissing gets sent to jail with a large fine for a student...

If there was shown to be deliberate mal-intent to "cause" him to commit suicide... then hell yeah... but that's not how this story reads. But of course the courts would have got there before me, especially with the long list of "offenses".

His sentence is an abusive joke.
 
Well the facts are he broke the law and got sentenced for it, despite it seemingly hurting your feelings :p

No... the facts are... the police/prosecutor threw everything they could possibly think of at him, no matter how pathetic, in the hope they could make something stick as someone let their feelings about the numpty killing himself get in the way of the facts ;)

No death = small civil settlement
Death = emotions running rampant & over-sentencing
 
No... the facts are... the police/prosecutor threw everything they could possibly think of at him, no matter how pathetic, in the hope they could make something stick as someone let their feelings about the numpty killing himself get in the way of the facts ;)

No death = small civil settlement
Death = emotions running rampant & over-sentencing

The facts are there, there is reason enough to believe he caused him to commit suicide.

Frankly if the lawyer found a way to sentence him, then he's doing his job.
 
Back
Top Bottom