Derby fire deaths: Parents arrested on suspicion of murder

TheBigCheese said:
There's a few posts here saying about why would you want to kill 5-6 people and surely there are better ways to do it.

I don't think that can be it...my mind can't get round the idea of doing it with that intention.

However assuming - just assuming they did do it...surely it would be with the intention of trying to get a bigger place to live, must have been cramped with that many people in there!

Could have seen too many films and thought they could get the kids out.
Click to expand...

If it's about moving, why set the fire when the kids are upstairs sleeping?

Also wouldn't that be a 50/50 gamble? There's just as much chance they could have ended up with a smaller house.
 
DiCe! said:
if convicted, Wont last long inside.
Click to expand...

They will be put in with the high risk category prisoners because of the nature of there crime to stop them being attacked by other prisoners, so they would have no contact with other prisoners apart from sex offenders high risk prisoners etc.

By doing this the prison would aim to protect them from being attacked or worse, pretty sad really that prisons go to this scale, but its very common with some crimes for the prison to do this.

I know what i would do if i had my way.
 
Last edited:
They go further than that mate.
They are on "numbers" (Rule43) as you say Protected everywhere they go & the Screws get right pally with them an all, All that one on one time builds up. If anything happens to a Nonse then the screw/screws in charge would be sacked.
Worst of all those on Numbers get there food first so that it can't be tampered with so all the other cons have to wait until the sex cases are served & out the way before they get there now Cold food.
 
kmufc77 said:
They will be put in with the high risk category prisoners because of the nature of there crime to stop them being attacked by other prisoners, so they would have no contact with other prisoners apart from sex offenders high risk prisoners etc.

By doing this the prison would aim to protect them from being attacked or worse, pretty sad really that prisons go to this scale, but its very common with some crimes for the prison to do this.

I know what i would do if i had my way.
Click to expand...

someone will still get them. there are still some hard nuts on 'the rule' as its known. or some screws will just sly a pack of fags to a nutter to give em a pasting.
 
4T5 said:
They go further than that mate.
They are on "numbers" (Rule43) as you say Protected everywhere they go & the Screws get right pally with them an all, All that one on one time builds up. If anything happens to a Nonse then the screw/screws in charge would be sacked.
Worst of all those on Numbers get there food first so that it can't be tampered with so all the other cons have to wait until the sex cases are served & out the way before they get there now Cold food.
Click to expand...

wat?
 
4T5 said:
They go further than that mate.
They are on "numbers" (Rule43) as you say Protected everywhere they go & the Screws get right pally with them an all, All that one on one time builds up. If anything happens to a Nonse then the screw/screws in charge would be sacked.
Worst of all those on Numbers get there food first so that it can't be tampered with so all the other cons have to wait until the sex cases are served & out the way before they get there now Cold food.
Click to expand...

where did you read that? might be like that in some places but its not everywhere

people get kickings all the time (often the screws doing it) and dont get in any ****.

the food thing is BS too. the kitchens would put **** in if they wanted to. each wing serves food at pretty much the same time.
 
realBabelfish said:
where did you read that? might be like that in some places but its not everywhere

people get kickings all the time (often the screws doing it) and dont get in any ****.

the food thing is BS too. the kitchens would put **** in if they wanted to. each wing serves food at pretty much the same time.
Click to expand...

I didn't "Read" it anywhere. :p
 
Delvis said:
Should have kept her legs closed and his winker in his pants then.
Click to expand...

Couldn't agree more!!!


estebanrey said:
If it's about moving, why set the fire when the kids are upstairs sleeping?

Also wouldn't that be a 50/50 gamble? There's just as much chance they could have ended up with a smaller house.
Click to expand...

Good question and yes. I don't have any answers, none of us do. I'm just hoping that it was a misguided attempt to get a bigger gaff...that's idiotic with tragic consequences, the other reason (to off them) is just sick so I hope it's the former, that's all I was saying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom