It is utterly bizarre to me that women are still thought of as second-class by some people. I wouldn't call myself a feminist though. I'd like to think of this opinion as being 'normal'.
+1
Though maybe in place of normal I'd insert 'balanced'.
It is utterly bizarre to me that women are still thought of as second-class by some people. I wouldn't call myself a feminist though. I'd like to think of this opinion as being 'normal'.
If you want her to do this because it's what you prefer, that's fine.
However, I think it's becoming more and more common for a woman to be expected to wax/shave down there. Why are they expected to do it? Women don't expect it of men!
Most of the guys I know don't mind a bit of hair, as long as it's kept neat and most women say the same for guys.
Would you ever sleep with a woman that didn't shave her legs or had hairy armpits? If you don't find it attractive then that's fine, but its when people say women should shave their legs/armpits that annoys me. Why should they? Some people don't care.
If you want her to do this because it's what you prefer, that's fine.
However, I think it's becoming more and more common for a woman to be expected to wax/shave down there. Why are they expected to do it? Women don't expect it of men!
Most of the guys I know don't mind a bit of hair, as long as it's kept neat and most women say the same for guys.
Would you ever sleep with a woman that didn't shave her legs or had hairy armpits? If you don't find it attractive then that's fine, but its when people say women SHOULD shave their legs/armpits that annoys me. Why should they? Some people don't care.
If you want her to do this because it's what you prefer, that's fine.
However, I think it's becoming more and more common for a woman to be expected to wax/shave down there. Why are they expected to do it? Women don't expect it of men!
Most of the guys I know don't mind a bit of hair, as long as it's kept neat and most women say the same for guys.
Would you ever sleep with a woman that didn't shave her legs or had hairy armpits? If you don't find it attractive then that's fine, but its when people say women SHOULD shave their legs/armpits that annoys me. Why should they? Some people don't care.
also, no one forces them to lap dance or go on page 3, everyone has choices.
A woman who leaves the kitchen unsupervised is a bad woman and deserves a spanking.
The word identifies only the female gender because it relates to the movements of women fighting against hundreds of years of oppression, so that they could be equal to men. I would identify as a feminist because it is the gender that is not equal.
And where are these issues for men? Men are the ones with the higher salaries, better job prospects, they aren't giving lap dances, they aren't on page 3 and being exploited just for their body etc etc.
No bloke likes eating bush to they? hairs in the mouth (VOM!)
And I'm sure no women like eating a guys bush either. Why are women expected to shave their legs/armpits when guys aren't?
Yes they do have a choice, but the choices some women have are so narrowed that they are forced into this kind of work due to being oversexualised by society.
In boxing, there're different weight categories, do lighter boxers get paid less? Since heavyweight and lightweight are not equal.
And I'm sure no women like eating a guys bush either. Why are women expected to shave their legs/armpits when guys aren't?
Generally, yes the heavyweights get paid more at the top level than the lightweights. Do the lightweights do less rounds by the way?
Its all business. If the lightweight fighters are more popular and will generate more revenue, they get paid more. If its the other way round, the heavyweights will get more.
You are basically advocating a completely flat sports payment system. You all get x amount because you all play the same sport. Don't worry about the fact that some of you are better or generate more income, we want to be equal. How can you pay 2 people equally who don't do the same thing and call that equality.
really? I cannot think of any reason why it would be a 'strip or don't eat' situation. there are plenty of other jobs they 'could' do, but maybe these stripping jobs require less work to get into. im not saying I don't think women get exploited, im just saying that everyone has a choice, most will take the easier option and then turn around and say there wasn't other options.
Society in some cases has made women think that their bodies are there to be used and its all they are good for. Some women aspire to be topless models for Nuts, because society has made them think that this is ok.
A good book to read about this is the Living Dolls: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Living-Doll...7093/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339772778&sr=8-1
Society in some cases has made women think that their bodies are there to be used and its all they are good for. Some women aspire to be topless models for Nuts, because society has made them think that this is ok.
A good book to read about this is the Living Dolls: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Living-Doll...7093/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339772778&sr=8-1
While some women may become successful in that area it is highly unlikely that all will since women have a much lower level of creativity and imagination - That's a proven fact (Google the area yourself)...
I love feminists, in fact I've really enjoyed a few of those feminist films where you have two of them either end of a phallic piece of rubber.
Society in some cases has made women think that their bodies are there to be used and its all they are good for. Some women aspire to be topless models for Nuts, because society has made them think that this is ok.