***** Pictures of things we bought in July 2012 *****

Key term here is "women" rather than "children". The bottomline here is that he's not only interested in looking at scantily clad representations of children but that he like's to publicise the fact. That's wrong on so many levels.

Surely if it was a problem he'd be pulled up by a police officer for wearing it in public?
 
Key term here is "women" rather than "children". The bottomline here is that he's not only interested in looking at scantily clad representations of children but that he like's to publicise the fact. That's wrong on so many levels.

I enjoy killing representation of soldiers in video games, does that make me a murderer?
 
Bought this \o/

1341615427109.jpg

Must buy one!!

Doesn't help when theres a picture of a girl bending over clearly stating 'im ready to take it' position.

+1
 
Key term here is "women" rather than "children". The bottomline here is that he's not only interested in looking at scantily clad representations of children but that he like's to publicise the fact. That's wrong on so many levels.

It's legal so whats the problem tbh, each to their own.

Im sure you would rather people were interested in that than some young kid (No offence OP just making a point)
 
Back
Top Bottom