William and kate on honeymoon

The_One · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:12

Womens day does it again :rolleyes:

but........ shes ripped :cool:

http://shesomajor.com/prince-william-royal-family-outraged/

Tikkabhuna · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:13

What's wrong with her face in that photo?! :eek:

kokuten · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:13

Tikkabhuna said:
What's wrong with her face in that photo?!

what face?! oh right..

jsmoke · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:13

She been working out on her shoulders.

Mat · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:15

<3 Kate

twist3d0n3 · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:16

i guess she's been arching her back a bit ^_^

krooton · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:16

MY EYES!!!!!

Marky · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:16

Oooo that magazine are gunna be in troooouble

The Halk · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:17

So will their readership tut and say it's terrible that their privacy has been invaded? Yes they will.
Will they stop buying the rag? No they won't.
Will people who both disapprove of the rag and who don't normally buy it, and who disapprove of these particular photographs buy this issue? Yes they will.

Haggisman · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:17

People find that attractive?! :eek:

Supercow · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:17

Whoaaa, not an ounce of fat!

edit: Yes this is a gay comment, but by god man, get yourself smoe decent boardies!

jsmoke · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:18

The Halk said:
So will their readership tut and say it's terrible that their privacy has been invaded? Yes they will.
Will they stop buying the rag? No they won't.
Will people who both disapprove of the rag and who don't normally buy it, and who disapprove of these particular photographs buy this issue? Yes they will.

Will still damage their long term credibility though.

[FnG]magnolia · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:18

Massive news over here and in Oz and the mag is reportedly expecting record sales. It's the same mag which ran the Camilla/Charles stuff.

^ hah, no it won't. Women's Day is essentially the National Enquirer of Australlia but in colour.

Westyfield2 · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:19

Wasn't there an an unofficial agreement among news organisations that they wouldn't print or publish photos of them on their holiday?

ElliorR · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:19

Too skinny.

[FnG]magnolia · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:20

Westyfield2 said:
Wasn't there an an unofficial agreement among news organisations that they wouldn't print or publish photos of them on their holiday?

Yes. Fingers are being pointed at UK photographers.

The_One · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:21

Yeah the uk press said they wouldnt send any photographers to the island

obviously someone did and womans day decided to buy them, bet the pap made millions!

Shayper · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:21

Christ he is going bald fast :eek:

Greebo · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:22

Marky said:
Oooo that magazine are gunna be in troooouble

The Halk said:
So will their readership tut and say it's terrible that their privacy has been invaded? Yes they will.
Will they stop buying the rag? No they won't.
Will people who both disapprove of the rag and who don't normally buy it, and who disapprove of these particular photographs buy this issue? Yes they will.

Not really. The agreement with the Royals is with the British press, they can't have an argeement with the press everywhere in the world.

And it is expected that it was just a local/holiday maker who took the pics and then cashed in later as opposed to a professional photographer.

Westyfield2 · 12 Jul 2012 at 12:22

IIRC there was a similar media blackout back in 2008 when the press were told by St James's Palace that Prince Harry was serving in Afghanistan but that they were not to publish it... and then one magazine did so he had to hastily leave as there were fears it could increase the danger to him and his fellow soldiers.