Tablets – Are they just a phase?

Mainstream users dont need as many functions as a laptop or desktop offers. They general stick to simple tasks which are better suited to tablets/phones, people like our parents will general use computers to read emails, a few websites, watch some things here and there. For all this a tablet makes perfect sense.
 
When I got my first touchscreen phone about three years ago I realised immediately that touch was going to be important. It is such a totally instinctive and natural way of interacting with a hand held device.

The important bit there is hand held... though I now find myself trying to touch my laptop screen all the time when I'm using it on my lap. When it's on a desk, that urge goes away, because my hands and forearms are settled firmly on the mouse & keyboard.

Anyway, earlier this year I bought an iPad for my techno-phobic mother. That was my first experience of a tablet and I'm afraid I very quickly cracked and bought one for myself. It became a very comfortable way of interacting with the net and basic applications, the "always on" and silent operation is excellent, and I have become totally sold on tablets as (a) a mass market device for the basic computing most "normal" folk need and (b) another niche-filling device for those of us who enjoy technology a little too much. :-)

When the Nexus7 was announced I realised immediately that a smaller, lighter (and cheap!) tablet would be even more useful than my iPad most of the time, and I've been proved right by the last week using it. A device you can stuff in a big pocket, hold comfortably in bed, and take anywhere with barely a second thought is very handy.

Of course for most people a phone fills that niche already. But the larger format is very convenient, especially if your eyesight's not perfect. So there's a crossover zone in which big (or very high res) phones and small tablets will naturally co-exist.

Overall there may be a faddy element to some tablet mania, but as I said above, there is no doubt whatsoever that touch devices are here to stay, and I understand why Microsoft are panicking, hence the compulsory Metro interface without an on/off option for the tablety stuff. They're right about adding a tablet interface, but wrong about that on/off toggle. :-)

I've made this point before but I kind of like it: items likes phones and tablets and PCs are becoming like shoes. One pair can carry you anywhere, but different footwear suits different occasions and uses, and can radically alter your experience. As Steve Jobs said, not everybody needs a truck/desktop PC, and I'd certainly say that nobody needs a tablet, but all these things have a place and a purpose.

</ramble>
 
OP have you ever even owned a tablet?

It is not just one big con, they really are great for media and browsing the web.
 
Because apps are pointlessly limited? Name an app that's better than a website or desktop version?

Apps are designed that way.

I don't know how about wpi just say games and tips give you about a million apps that are identical to website and yet don't need an Internet connection.

I also have a full browser, which works great.

Apps are only limited due to screen size and touch screen. Something windows8 won't be doing.

That's the problem with these threads, people are stuck in the present, rather than looking at the trend and future technology. We are after all asking if it's a fad, which needs you to think about the future.
 
Surely a similar argument is "why do people go to the cinema, when you can do the exact same with your TV?". Ridiculous question.
 
They aren't a phase, but I do feel strongly that no tablet should be priced over £250. Above that you end up in laptop territory but without any of the advantages.
 
They aren't a phase, but I do feel strongly that no tablet should be priced over £250. Above that you end up in laptop territory but without any of the advantages.

Laptop has no advantage and many disadvantage.
There's no way I would buy a laptop. It offers zero over a tablet and combined with a cumbersome form factor.

Different uses require different form factors.most people consume media. On top if that look at the win8 tablet/laptop hybrids that are planned. Why would anyone buy a straight up laptop.
 
Laptop has no advantage and many disadvantage.
There's no way I would buy a laptop. It offers zero over a tablet and combined with a cumbersome form factor.

Different uses require different form factors.most people consume media. On top if that look at the win8 tablet/laptop hybrids that are planned. Why would anyone buy a straight up laptop.

Don't know what your on. Laptops are brilliant at what they do. Netbooks however I can say any decent tablet will win that war.
 
They aren't a phase, but I do feel strongly that no tablet should be priced over £250. Above that you end up in laptop territory but without any of the advantages.

People like the fact that they can sit down on the sofa, press a button, the tablet instantly comes on, and they can look at what they want without any fuss.

A laptop gets hot, is more bulky, has a boot time, etc.

I understand people on this forum won't generally replace anything with a tablet, but people who just go on the internet now and again very much have and do. There's also the fact the screen on the iPad 3 for example is of a far higher quality than most laptops and especially ones in the £500~ price band.

fad, yes. i give it 2 years tops

Not sure if serious.
 
Don't know what your on. Laptops are brilliant at what they do. Netbooks however I can say any decent tablet will win that war.

Perhaps because I consume media and thus a heavy laptop that has to be unfolded and thus unbalanced, is a massive disadvantage, while offering zero advantages. Just because equipment can do more, doesn't mean people actually use those features.
 
Perhaps because I consume media and thus a heavy laptop that has to be unfolded and thus unbalanced, is a massive disadvantage, while offering zero advantages. Just because equipment can do more, doesn't mean people actually use those features.

I replaced my tower pc with a decent laptop. I'm a person like millions of others who use a windows based pc do do many things which any current tablet simply cannot do. I have a smartphone, a tablet and several computer's. They all do different things and not one single item can do it all. Shame as I'm patiently waiting for such a gadget
 
Laptop has no advantage and many disadvantage.
There's no way I would buy a laptop. It offers zero over a tablet and combined with a cumbersome form factor.

Different uses require different form factors.most people consume media. On top if that look at the win8 tablet/laptop hybrids that are planned. Why would anyone buy a straight up laptop.

Not sure if serious?

A laptop is much, much more flexible and has many advantages over a tablet:

  • Bigger screen
  • More powerful, which means they're actually suitable for productivity work (ie Photoshop) and proper gaming
  • Runs Adobe Flash and deals with JavaScript without issues
  • Upgradeable so will last a good few years
  • Doesn't languish on older versions of an OS because the manufacturer dictates it (ie iPad 1, iOS5)
  • Not locked into a manufacturer ecosystem (ie App Store) so you can buy applications or download them from wherever you want which also means a much better selection of applications
  • Better for media consumption, because codecs can easily be installed to play anything and no need to mess around with iTunes
  • A physical keyboard, almost universally accepted to be better than an on screen keyboard

I can see a use case for a tablet for someone who only ever wants to check their mail and browse the web... but what happens if they buy a new digital camera. How do they get photos on there without a computer? Or maybe they want to write a formal letter with proper formatting? Either way, you need a computer.

Tablets are pretty cool, but they have a long way to go yet before they replace laptops.
 
Back
Top Bottom