Defo the opposite IMO. Bigger screens = bigger pixels = bad IQ. You would need to turn up settings like AA to get a similar IQ to a 21 inch with a 50 inch. Smaller screens are much better.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
680 gtx 2048mb or 4096mb for 50" plasma TV
- Thread starter Ryansb12
- Start date
Defo the opposite IMO. Bigger screens = bigger pixels = bad IQ. You would need to turn up settings like AA to get a similar IQ to a 21 inch with a 50 inch. Smaller screens are much better.
Not sure about that 55 inchs looks pretty stunning where I'm sitting
Only artificially because you're sitting far away. The picture quality will be awful compared to a properly calibrated PC monitor. Not to mention input lag etc.
ah well keeps me happy (sony xbr8) but yeah its not a dell supersharp, input lag however is actually very good I think 20ms - 30ms greater than a crt in game mode, but unfortunatley this turns off the local dimming.
In gaming monitors the input lag and g2g is generally <5ms. That t.v will look good from 7ft away, I used one for 2 months myself.
Depends on the game. 2gb should be fine, unless he's one of these people (like myself) who like running skyrim with various texture packs and other addons. If that's the case then he will likely experience choppiness due to texture swapping with a 2GB card.
With 670's so close and sometimes passing the 680's. I would stick with going for a 670.