** ALL NEW (WITH RULES) Summer Transfer Window 2012/2013 Season Rumours/Signings **
- Thread starter Andybtsn
- Start date
- Status
signing for the reserves (whoever he goes to)?
I supose with Keane out for the season (effectively) that might make sense
edit - so Gill's statement " we are hoping to sign a couple of players before the season" (or words to that effect) were implying two strikers (one of which is reserve) - grrrrr
Until a bid is accepted, nope
.Well that's your interpretation of it, I keep reading he would rather stay and be wanted by Liverpool, but doesn't want to stay somewhere he isn't wanted - therefore probably a bit annoyed Liverpool willing to sell him.
The difference between saying 'my situation' and 'the situation' is a fair bit different, my could easily imply my situation in being at Liverpool FC. Maybe it was 'the' in Danish and poorly translated, because 'my' isn't very conclusive and would really hint towards fine with being at Liverpool since it is where he constantly reiterates is where he wants to be if wanted by the club.
I imagine he'll play with the reserves for a season to get settled in the country, or go on loan somewhere perhaps.
As Tom mentioned above, he's been on trial with us several times since he was 15 so appears to effectively be 'our' player.
There's also talk that we're in for Swansea's Neil Taylor, who plays left-back, have you seen that?
He doesn't say that. He says he's fine with his situation.
You've gone from selectively quoting Agger to suit your argument to twisting what he's said and adding your assumptions to suit your argument.
As I said, either take everything he says with a pinch of salt or believe it all.
Associate
- Joined
- 15 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 880
- Location
- Wolverhampton
We dont need to sell, so we can hold out for the best possible price, and i love the fact that Moxey hasnt just bent over for Fletcher because he handed in a transfer request, and also that he is keeping the fans upto date with what is happening with Fletcher and Jarvis
And another team are in for him aswell now...
Holy ****, can you not see you could interpret 'I'm fine with my situation' as 'I'm fine with my situation (at Liverpool)' and therefore not want to move and would prefer to stay as opposed to I'm fine being up for sale?
I never twisted what he said, if I did that it would imply I'd quoted him as saying something he didn't, I'm saying he could feel slightly annoyed with the fact Liverpool are happy to sell him(Not going to say this directly are you? I'm sure he hardly fancies a worse contract if the move to City doesn't go through?)??
As I've said, open your eyes and see things can be interpreted in different ways, what he said isn't clear cut. If it was I'd agree with you but you just seem to ignore it and it can only be seen the way you see it.
heard speculation during the Olympics regarding this - not convinced to say the least
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
Papers say 4 million for henriquez . City trying to hijack according to the mirror.
There you go again. He's not up for sale - City bid, we rejected. If City offer us a huge amount, we might consider it and then it will be down to Agger's wishes.
And as I've said, he says separately and specifically that he wants to stay at Liverpool. That and the fact that he's referring to a question about City's interest and is commenting on Liverpool's stance makes it pretty clear that when he says he's fine with his situation, he's not simply saying he wants to stay. I think it reads to most people that he's fine with what's going on and unlike you, he's not overly sensitive.
Carry on twisting things he's said, making assumptions based on things he hasn't said and then using something Agger has said as conclusive proof that that's the absolute situation though.
I suspect we'll sell him to lower our wage bill though - like we did with Suarez and about to do with Skrtel too.
Pretty sure this is the kid that we signed about 6 or more months ago but left with his parent club. As mentioned, we were supposed to have been watching him for years and had tied up a £4m deal earlier this year.
Sounds like a good little player but you tend to get what you pay for in the end. Chicharito has yet to show us the form of his first season and is looking more like an average deal compared to his perceived value after his first season.
If we're considering selling him, he is up for sale
If you put something up for sale, you're actively looking to sell. If somebody approaches you and makes you an offer that you can't refuse, it's a very different scenario.
Agger's up for sale in the same way that any player at near enough any club is up for sale. In fact, he's up for sale in the same way that nearly any possession owned by near enough any person is up for sale.
Right so if we're willing to sell he is up for sale then?
@wedgie, if he had said 'the' situation there wouldn't be anything to interpret, in fact it would be pretty clear he is probably happier going to City, but he said my situation which could easily mean my situation = playing for Liverpool. Although it would seem that is crazy wild speculation from myself....
@wedgie, if he had said 'the' situation there wouldn't be anything to interpret, in fact it would be pretty clear he is probably happier going to City, but he said my situation which could easily mean my situation = playing for Liverpool. Although it would seem that is crazy wild speculation from myself....
And you have the cheek to comment on the likes of CM not being able to understand basic things?
That's the thing, nobody can actually know yet which is all we're saying. He doesn't get to test his metal until a bid is accepted. Unless he comes out before then with an unequivocal I am not moving to City or anywhere else, there's nothing too much to read into what anyone is saying other than the usual transfer dance we've all seen a million times before.
- Status