And you would pass yours i presume?
Drivers get bad habits, Im a very safe driver, Never had a crash and allways stick to the speed limit.
but if i was to retake my test i know i would fail, because as an experienced driver you know what you can do and what you cant in each surroundings.. It doesn't matter What you SHOULD DO... and the test is testing what you should do no matter the environment...
i would say 50% of good drivers out there today would fail the driving test if made to re-sit
No I wouldn't (doesn't mean I don't think that in some respects it is a good idea) and frankly I think 50% is a little to low.
That's my point though really.
I have arguments for either side of it really, personally I couldn't be arsed with a retest but if it was made a requirement then I certainly wouldn't complain about it.
I'm a confident driver, I know what I can and can't do and follow/drive safely most of the time, but I also have moments where I possibly drive to quick or a bit dangerously (roadrage tbh, experienced it this morning following a 61 plate X5 through 4 junctions/turnings of which NONE of them (including stopping in the middle of the road and turning into her driveway) she had indicated for - Beeped and put my foot down.
)/shrug old people get annoying.
Retest for what though? You say it like the best drivers are the ones fresh out of driving school...which are currently, according to the insurance companies, the absolute worst drivers in the country.
Not sure how I said it like that, I only posted a sentence.

Wilderbeast said:Now if we were to introduce a new safety check after 5 years of driving, then fair play, but not a straight retest, as that's pretty stupid.
Safety check then, I wasn't being specific on how to test it, I guess "retest" was not the right word to use. Just something to ensure that we have at least SOME form of driving check every few years.
Last edited:




